z4ys

@admin is it possible to remove salt because its now an annoying fishing drop. 😄

But not what flag belongs to nation xy. Current visual display can put someone in mind that it's possible regardless of nation to pick one of those flags even dlc discription is more clear.

Prolog: Currently all player trading at sea can only be done between the mainships. When something is located in fleetship hold an error message shows up that said goods are not available. Example: I sailed a wapen and had an indiaman in fleet. Instead of loading my indiaman my wapen had to take the stuff. That was a aweful lot of clicking till the indiaman hold was filled. Suggestion: Add option to select to and out of what shiphold goods should be transfered

search " pvp missions will be added " as phrase + author admin

+1

Recognition as greatest coward or biggest pro

West End PB - sorry for the sometimes boring Mbrig view

Thx brits for the nice battle

I started destroying (flipping them overboard) doubloons because my holds and pockets are already full and I can't hide my treasure chests in NA.

Ports with Port Battles schedule should automatically become closed to all after next maintenance

What about you have additional to what you said to stay wihin tag distance just like trading?

Its still possible to use the whisper function even with enemy players. So its still possible to talk to all firends evenwhen they are enemies. Less talking more pew pew

I like it this way we have it now. I get way less insulted while I chase someone.

this. otherwise open to exploit

Prolog: Because joining a clan will be part of the Operations: Welcome to the Caribbean, I think that the current Clan Leaderboard is misleading. Looking at the picture above someone could think ROVER is a clan of mixed PvP and PvE and sometimes RvR. Thats not reflecting the truth. Most PvE kills are Player fleetships. On top the PvP KD ratio is misleading as well. Suggestion: Hovering over the stats reveals more detailed infos. It could look like this Ontop: Hovering over ROVER would reveal a short clan discription made by the clan creator

In my opinion people should plan ahead and always expect the worst. When I just have 30 mins I dont do something that could keep me ingame for more than 30 mins. But when I do I do it and know that i will use surrender or logout before in OW while using the 120 timer. To me it looks like as the thread creator had no clue about the game mechanics. Sure game could give a warning when pressing "leave game" while not in port. But how it will prevent those people that use alt f4. Should we gave safe logout out of battles? - No we had it and it was abused to shit. There should be no "free to leave a gank card" you got yourself into the situation so deal with it - outsmart your enemies. There is no need that the game holds players hands here. a la others are so mean so take my hand i pull you out of your own created misery.

at this point PZ wasnt as popular like now

Write a suggestion your points are valid. What would help is the Ka ratio compared to the average br ratio.

Sorry wasnt clear enough. I was just talking about the visuals. For me the detail of rigging is a key factor what divides good ship model from bad ones. Ships in total war for example looked odd because they have a poor modelling of their rigging.

@sterner will the ships get the same lvl of detail like Diana in NA regarding the rigging?

Maybe it shouldn't be totally hidden. Sure you would see a boarding party getting ready to step on your ship so commands could be revealed by Aggressive command : means could be grenades or attack Defensive: defend muskets brace But let us test the 2 extremes first.

When you attack an unarmed trader and he complains of being ganked

no guns equiped still showing guns