Jump to content
Naval Games Community

PrezesOi

Naval Action Tester
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    375

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by PrezesOi

  1. PrezesOi
    I wonder if THIS will be able to one-shot to [almost] sink small to medium ships (yacht - snow or even brig).
  2. PrezesOi
    If I had to change the country in which I live, I would choose land down under , for many reasons. I happened to contemplate such thing few times. But few years ago I learned from my buddy what ping to the rest of the world you have, and idyllic picture broke. Still, I wish we could play all together :-(
  3. PrezesOi
    Charles try to uninstall & install again. Worked for me.
  4. PrezesOi
    Avcom was added to Potbs at very late stage, by popular terror demand. And it sucked like hell. I suggest adding avcom, just after NA will reach such success that Blizzard will become nervous , and Game-Labs will have enough cash to buy HMS Victory to dock it as a mascot in front of their HQ.
  5. PrezesOi
    Ramming drama thread No#4537. Booooring. Ramming is now (after many changes that weaken it) so risky that it has ... become realistic. Now it still in use but only when it makes sense, bearing in mind that in most cases, this means suicide and minimal damage to the opponent. Like Prater said - currently more usable than ramming is forcing enemy to ram you. I call this bowsprit kiss.
  6. PrezesOi
    Activities should be end content, not most expensive ships, just because they are expensive or time consuming (for nolife grindmonkeys). Activity so varied that owner ofS antisima will jump with joy to Cutter, to take part in activitivity for light ships veterans.
  7. PrezesOi
    Are Santisima or Victory awesome ships for line battle? Of course. Will be Naval Action line battle simulator? I hope not. With equal pleasure I'm using all available ships, and I hope that the full game will offer such variety of activities, so that it will be still. All this discussion about limiting players by some leet criteria seems to me to be inappropriate. Let the Game-Labs put it clear what is their target? 200 or 200,000 players? Battles rarely been planned by the brilliant strategists whose orders were executed by perfectly trained officers, always competent. Most often it was the opposite - and less pathetic side won.
  8. PrezesOi
    FatAlan (Victory), Souvenir (Constitution), ChillyWilly (Constitution), sseay (Snow). versus PrezesOi (Santisima), Marik (Constitution), 5th_Hellrider (Trincomale), Game-Labs (Surprise). That would be enough for now. In my few clips I showed what I like most at the Naval Action :-)
  9. PrezesOi
    One of today Trafalgar battles (at least first 24 minutes).
  10. PrezesOi

    Freezes

    PrezesOi replied to Exiffa's topic in Support

    These symptoms are the most common effect of a bottleneck between disk-memory-processor. In your place, I would have made sure that motherboard chipset drivers are up to date. For disk - if this is the SSD, check for a newer firmware is available. Sometimes the cause is a loose SATA cable .
  11. PrezesOi
    Wesołych Świąt +18 http://oi61.tinypic.com/2rzxohx.jpg
  12. PrezesOi
    This. On the other hand, we should be happy - Naval Action is already legit internet multiplayer game. Drama. Tragedies. Hatred. Contempt. Respect. Defending so called fair play. Trolling. Etc...
  13. PrezesOi
    Great idea , but it has been discussed on the forum and we all agree that we would like to have the freedom to move around the ship. But this topic is about something else, and in my opinion , easier to implement without rebuilding game engine. Btw-there will be just one server.
  14. PrezesOi
    I suggest adding new/additional observation points ("cameras"), operated by numeric keys. If such a thing were implemented, maybe we can have option (not mandatory!) to disable external camera for fans of realism? "Smaller" ships: 8 - Bow 4 - Portboard 5 - Crow's nest, top of the main mast 6 - Starboard 2 - Stern "Bigger" ships, additional cameras 7 - Port bow 9 - Starboard bow 1 - Port quarter 3 - Starboard quarter What do you think?
  15. PrezesOi
    My 2 cents :-) Opposing force: cpt. DarkRaven (Lynx), cpt. ChuckB (Cutter) My ship: Yacht. This boat (full name: Royal Armed Yacht) is a gift for all those who preorder the game. The interesting thing - when I started playing, my first impression was " Oh my God , what a shit they gave ! ". But when I got to know the game better, I completely changed my opinion. Yacht is awesome. Why? I think the video above is sufficient proof :-)
  16. PrezesOi
    Pay attention to the chat (2:26) - a cry of despair that failed to come out from the throat "ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd!" :-)
  17. PrezesOi
    I have never played WoW (but i have played warcraft 1-3 ) but i guess Blizzard know what could be problematic, so why don't you take a look at https://us.battle.net/support/en/article/naming-policy and adopt some of rules? Besides, please pay attention to the potential problem of enemy or ally identification, so well-known to PotbS veterans. "Target that Peter / Piotrek / Питер / 彼得 / ਪਤਰਸ ਨੂੰ !!!" Can we have numbers above nicknames in battle?
  18. PrezesOi
    Use power of https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSoPUSGj64t3qaWX4PgewcTFMXz96tF2x4zJYfvg5HPkVVhSQn1wnUGVg maximize button & Taskbar auto hide http://pad1.whstatic.com/images/thumb/4/44/Autohide-the-Taskbar-in-Windows-7-Step-2-Version-2.jpg/670px-Autohide-the-Taskbar-in-Windows-7-Step-2-Version-2.jpg
  19. PrezesOi
    Lets remove all repairs during combat, and implement kedging, towing ,etc I'm just kidding ofc In above keddging was used for saving Constitution, but normally it was in use when ship was demasted, and there was no other way to repair it at sea (lack of materials). Of course, this technique was useless on a deeper waters.
  20. PrezesOi
    Salute! I loved [prehistoric] burnningsea forums because of high level it presented , mostly thanks to "pillars of community" like you. And for Naval Action - $ 40 for a game that is not yet properly a game, produced by a company you never heard of? Gameplay about which almost nothing is known? It sounds silly, but I honestly recommend to buy it :-)
  21. PrezesOi

    ghost ship

    PrezesOi posted a gallery image in Members Albums Category

    ghost ship

    From the album: PrezesOi

    Bellona, storm.
  22. PrezesOi
    In this case, I am up for reduction in realism, in favor of the gameplay. We are here for sailing&pew pew not for drifting without masts
  23. PrezesOi
    I just hope that the creation of such a list will be not necessary, because GL will be sufficiently sensitive to signs of excessive rudeness and effective in enforcing discipline. This: THE ARTICLES OF WAR 1757 The Articles of War on board a Royal Navy ship matched the gravity of holy writ. It served as the law practiced upon His Majesty's Ships. The Articles were originally established in the 1650s, amended in 1749 (by an act of Parliament) and again in 1757.
  24. PrezesOi
    All true - but servers are G-L property, so douchebag player comes to a party at G-L home.
  25. PrezesOi
    I like idea of such list. BUT-I'm not sure if official forum/website is proper place for such thing. In my opinion, G-L should not take part or sponsor list which stigmatize players. As game developers, they have (or they will have in future) their rules of conduct, and a list of behaviors that they will punish at their discretion. Such list could be a approved and carried out by the organization of which I read on the forum http://forum.game-labs.net/index.php?/topic/2147-announcing-the-association-of-unified-society-leaders-ausl/ Maybe on facebook?
×
×
  • Create New...