Jump to content
Naval Games Community

admin

Administrators
  • Posts

    17,066
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1,129

Everything posted by admin

  1. Some fleets have mind of their own and travel further to hunt for targets. They are getting paid for kills but we will slightly reduce the distance of privateering (new feature allowing them to venture out further - to make the world more alive)
  2. It does count.
  3. Please do not take words out of context. I was responding to the known troll and ban evader Intrepido whose only goal is to hate on the game everywhere he can (now under the name of Montanes). He claimed that "dutches are pissed off" for which we replied quoting him and banned the shitposter. The ship removal from crafting has nothnig to do with its nationality or any nationality.
  4. How are those issues related? One is disabling chat, another enabling names?
  5. main post updated
  6. + Another fact is obvious. Even when they are in structured form and it seems hard for you to even read them all. Players were usually very upset when we were not responding and not acknowledging each and one post on the forum. We now hope everyone sees that it is impossible.
  7. You can use the sort by date and just move to the oldest.. If you sort by votes you can just vote for first page.
  8. Main post updated to give a proper indication of the time period of possible patch deployment, so nobody has any ideas from the vague indications which we used in the past.
  9. I thought you are not watching anymore.. :+)
  10. https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Valve_Time Here is the table that you can use to estimate what 2 weeks can be. It can be 1 week or it can be NEVER. If you use this table you will never be upset.
  11. NA firmware does not require urgent update, game works, you dont have major bugs. Whats the point of standing with a lighter and asking are we there yet every 5 mins? Remember the valve time (My previous signature) maybe i should bring it back https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Valve_Time Best time promise: Shortly, (real delivery in 6 months) We are not paid for being on time. We are paid for delivering good content. We will miss dates with ease and will not ever be upset about them. We dont have publishers or schedules. We love the sea and work for our enjoyment without any deadlines - forever.
  12. Sort by date or by votes. Easy, barely an inconvinience.
  13. Because you think its two weeks but then you see 2 amazing features you want to add. Patch will be done when its ready. Its better to have a good patch later than a bad patch earlier. Patch will hit when the patchnotes will be posted. When you see estimated times always look at them with the grain of salt.
  14. We never promise dates and are not on the schedule and will never be. Expect the worst and lower your expectations man. All dates are for estimations only and if we find something important to put to patch we will ship the feature later. They are never late because they are due when they are done not when they are expected.
  15. we already did..just read a couple of paragraphs. And will never stop doing so.. Did you miss that thank you note? We also thanked community for bringing redoutable to global top sellers list. You are probably new judging by your number of posts.
  16. I like this comment most Kenway. I already responded to it. You think we were able to make a top selling early access release of 2019 (Valve opinion) by driving blind. This is would be a tremendous achievement and you should praise us and bend your knee . Its impossible to do anything without playing. And all our actions are focused on raising online and raising retention. Grind is part of it by the way. Its a nature of an MMO. If you want grind free games dont play MMOs. Thanks On the feedback issue. We have committed. If individual feedback is great it will be pushed up by the community. So we confirm. We no longer read individual posts and will only read this section. https://forum.game-labs.net/forum/69-feature-proposals-and-gameplay-help-qa/ Previous method gave too much false hopes and dissapointment like "my post was not responded to - bad developers". It also gave too much trouble due to language differences. For example your post might be constructive but i read it as attacking and hostile. I would better read your highly voted feature proposal and i no longer wish to read your opinions on any matter because they are irrelevant to great feature ideas you might have.
  17. but you can ask @Cetric de Cornusiac to bring ALL pve server here and make sure their voice is heard like it was heard with Loki
  18. Feature proposal started working amazingly well. We see real top issues and can talk to and reward those who propose things interesting to the community. 23 April The following ideas are taken into development and the post will be deleted to give space to others. Feature is not hard to do. Is useful and logical, as captains could manage to take some guns from a sinking ship. The feature is accepted in the development pipeline. LT Sekiro will receive a 5/5 all top port bonuses de Ruyter 3rd rate for his popular proposal, once his proposal gets in game and is implemented next patch! Next review in a week or two.
  19. New ships events will always be popular especially if you cannot get them the other way. Now players know they cant get the ship the other way - more will come to the concerts. The idea to open ships to everyone without any effort does not work for us any more + did we did not receive enough praise in reviews for our previous positive change in the game, we no longer see the point of adding content that people can get without effort. Community can change our mind by not sitting on the fence and leaving a review for our previous work. In general - Sometimes we are wrong, but we have experience in this and having sold 1 mln of copies of various games over last 4 years and having recieved multple awards (www.game-labs.net) we can safely say that on average individual members of the are wrong more often than us. Community as a whole IS ALWAYS RIGHT, but indivudual members are mostly (50% of cases) wrong. So we no longer respond to individual members and will only talk to general community. We are stopping responding general forums and only will focus on highy rated and voted posts in the Q&A section. https://forum.game-labs.net/forum/69-feature-proposals-and-gameplay-help-qa/ the section started working amazingly well right from the first day. Bad or useless ideas are downvoted, we read only real useful proposals. Users immediately see if their AMAZING armchair desiNG is interesting to others or not. We will only respond to top proposals in detail without wasting time on downvoted below average proposals. Users will also not be upset anymore because they will see their amazing ideas are not popular. But we will always respond to popular ones. We will continue talking in patchfeedback about patches.But only if comments relates to patches.
  20. Interesting LOGIC Everyone showed up to see Depeche Mode, because they were excited about Depeche Mode. Nobody gives a ____ about the concert They give a ___ about the Depeche Mode. Why have concerts - If you can just add Depeche mode.. No! You do not make ANY sense. Thats the point to have concerts - to see something you are excited about. Same with events.
  21. Captains Please post your ideas related to ART, Texts, localization, and other issues not related to RVR, Combat, Economy and DLC proposals. Standard rules apply. Please propose your ideas in the following way. 1 Post = 1 Proposal. Players will vote on 1 proposals only. Multiple proposals will mix different subjects and confuse. Multitiered or multi subject proposals will be removed. Keep the proposals on the topic subjects Do not comment. The thread is for proposals only If you want to improve on other people proposals contact them so they can update the post. Best proposals will be brought up by the system based on likes and we will comment on them once in a while. Proposals which dont get community attention will be ignored and will sink to the bottom. Example of formatting Correct example Cannon crafting proposals Cannon crafting change rationale Cannon crafting current version and whats wrong Proposal on cannon crafting change Incorrect version One post Cannon crafting proposal (should be a separate in a economy section) Trading proposal (should be a separate post in an economy section) Hostility proposal (should be a separate post in RVR section) DLC ship proposal (should be a separate post in DLC section
  22. Interesting observation in 2014))
  23. https://forum.game-labs.net/forum/69-feature-proposals-and-gameplay-help-qa/
×
×
  • Create New...