admin

Under review @Krists - Clan ship docks @Captain Reverse - Crafting progression per player not per port @Genevieve Malfleurs - Ship Contracts Rejected @MassimoSud - AI Bots Trading on map. Impossible to implement due to anti hacking and anti exploit architecture. Everything we have in game is on the server, adding a real ship to the map is adding to server capacity (which is 2500 max). Possible in the game client but can be hacked

From the art proposals Sent to programmers for estimation of work @Nixolai - Show information on ship books in Open sea in F @Mormegil - Ship tags in Navy information @der Wallone - sound playing during attack (but it will only be for one player - we wont spam others with your sounds) Delayed or rejected @van stiermarken - multiple flags and improvements for banners and pennants - impossible to rework the tech Sea Legends will allow full flexibility with banners @Audacious- add wooden or metal textures and form to windows and other parts - UI is finished and changing things back and forth like in 2017 is not going to achieve anything @mexicanbatman - Increase amount of sailors - no animation work is planned, due to complexity and low budgets for this. Combat @GrubbyZebra - launches or launched small cutter fireships were planned but delayed. Will review again @William Death- Random fire mode - ok will review (i use random fire sometimes) Not rejected but impossible to do within reasonable time range @Sea Archer Short range musket fire - It was tested internally and did not click as it requires animations, sounds, visuals of musketmen on masts, + significant rework of combat shooting which might break everything Sea legends has proper musket fire mechanics. Reverse coding it into NA will take too much time @Krists Different ammunition on different decks - significant rework of UI will be required and it is not an easy feature to make look good. Sea Legends has proper management of gun batteries (per battery), but reverse coding it into NA will take too much time. Rejected @Sea Archer - Water depths - 3d depths will require map rework and without good visualization this feature will only cause hate and frustration. Its good on paper but would be bad without proper visuals. @Gamover- close battles on request - will review again, but most likely answer is no, because despite you wanting them to close this will reduce options for others. 90% chance for NO. To be continued RVR Sent to programmer for estimation @qw569😳 - global clan leaderboard @HamBlower - mortar brig damage and range buff - under review @Yachteru - add names for players - under review Rejected or delayed @Bodye - allow deletion of outposts with ships - impossible, we allowed this in the past and have no time to recover assets for people who deleted by mistakes. @MassimoSud - clan civil war - impossible to rework nations without complete wipe, in addition to that - players come to sail for a flag. Whats important is that we now know what kind of nations should and how national mechanics must work for future games. @TheDread - Allow port transfer without the loss of investments. - Port transfer is not available by design. If port transfer is cheap and free it creates too many exploits. Also its not historical. No nation was able to transfer regions to another nation peacefully without loss of productivity.

brigading and ganging up on people is against the rules of this forum If this continues we will move national news and tavern to Steam! locked

go to your video card manufacturer website and download the latest drivers

круги ставится от атакуемого мечи ставятся посередине между атакуемым и нападающим просто круги появились позже в игре.

Its working extremely well. It should have been done long time ago. We see what community wants Individual players see when their idea is popular or not We will provide responses for first batch of voted proposals soon. We said above we are in this topic for conversationalist purposes. we don't take ideas in conversation threads. Nations wont change and more might appear. + judging by votes nation number is not a high priority on the community's mind.

use imgur.com and just drop a link here in the post to post pictures and examples

Please stop bringing this strange phrase that we dont consider them We consider all good proposals and implemented most ideas that we liked, including open world itself (na initally was a instance based lobby shooter). We never promised that we will implement all the player proposals and never promised that we will reply to each of them. Proposals were always considered. Now there is even a streamlined system to get the attention to them https://forum.game-labs.net/forum/69-feature-proposals-and-gameplay-help-qa/ The main bottleneck is not good ideas, the bottleneck is in programmers. Many demand that we work like a 20-100+ crew AAA company, demand that we review every post and reply to everyone, they forget that NA is an indie game made by a small indie team. At the peak we had 3 programmers, now we have one. None of our games had teams bigger than 3 programmers. Now to both @Koltes and you The game is being sold as is. This is the game. 50+ ships, beautiful world, adrenaline and frustration. With its beauty and flaws. Consider the game done. It might improve, but not by much.

We had alliances. Biggest nations signed an alliance controlled large portions of the map - there is no difference with what it is now. The only natural limiter of large nations is crew recruitment and conversion times (you cant recruit crew in a port you just captured and 50 in game years must pass before you can recruit or repopulate with immigrants) The second best limiter is forced alliances. But forced alliances while increasing RVR options, drastically reduce global pvp

welcome back again))

To rephrase.. if we opened a subscription based server with just 3 nations next moth - it would start well and will then will have to be closed down, for being unpopular.

We are not planning to change national mechanics or number of nations, until current priorities are done - they may never get on the list as there is always something more important than this. Meanwhile There IS an example of the flag without ports in the game already. This means the number of nations is in the hands of the players. This is not 2020, we dont have guaranteed borders or NATO. Don't like how someone has colonies in the Americas? You are already at war! Destroy their investments, capture ALL their ports, burn their ships and hear lamentation of their clan leaders in chat.

Offline mode works and I use it often but even then it requires to login from time to time.

That did not relate to sweden and swedish captains. It meant a lot of nations changed leadership and every time we heard whining about strong nations. Pirates ruled the world and we were bombarded with - PIRATES BAD PLEASE NERF.. so Sweden might go strong again - when next Carl comes to play. And then whiners will say NERF SWEDEN - NON HISTORICAL

Thinking about Tuscany and Venice and Italy in general Columbus Amerigo Vespucci John Cabot Verrazzano Were all italians

1 was screening

We did explain. North Americas had multiple russian colonies. We never said we are looking for caribbean only. Nations that could be still added Malta/Hospitalliers - an elite PVP order which could be invite only or something (had a colony in 1651), some scrolls could be found and some elite players might decide to resurrect it through a chain of events or something (Can be destroyable) Venice/Duchy of Tuscany - could be nation of traders (established presence in 1608) Scotland - Special historical nation for @Angus MacDuff - had colonies in multiple places in the Americas including NA town of Dariena Norse - special early historical nation for @Swedish Berserker - had presence in north north americas. But maybe too much... But i like how @Swedish Berserker talks to haters.. maybe i will grant him a colony.. can be a destroyable nation. Lost boarding = lost a character.

Nations come and go - whiners remain.

They might .. ETA 2 to 99 weeks, might never come. What is your interest in this subject? Sweden also only had one puny town https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustavia,_Saint_Barthélemy and look at them in game now.. A big rival to everyone, thanks player's willpower and organization. This game is a what if game. We have no plans to change anything in terms of national composition and are only replying for educational purposes.

No.. We never said it is the only cause. Please do not misquote us. We said we are not adding portugal because those nations would be empty. We had reservations about poland, even though courland had a colony. Poland was final decision was made because @Bart Smith one of our first testers and mods - said please.

We are deliberatly stating North Americas. If you could get to Americas you could get to Caribbean. Read up about Russian adventures on the west coast and alaska. Its really simple.. Original choice in 2013 was 3 nations but then we researched the subject. First addition was United States, because we wanted USS constitution in game. If United States (did not exist before 1775) get in - all nations who were present get in.

You propose the game to have historical nations. we already do. We are not bound by an incorrect and non historical 3 nation view (only britain only spain only france) which was pushed into traditional history books and games by the victors (History is written by the victors). Eventually we will add all nations which had settlements in the North Americas. Maracaibo was founded by german conquistadors and the area near maracaibo was controlled by german kings for quite a while. Brandenburg owned the whole island of St Thomas Chinese laborers had a settlement on Trinidad from 1800+ And Poland Courland controlled Tobago until they sold it to the English. Couple of nations are even lacking now. For example scotland which had a colony in Dariena for some time Once scotland and some other minor nations are added your desire to have historical colonies will be fulfilled. We will have historical caribbean composition. (not the incorrect composition of nations which other game designers were pushing in their games). Our game explores the WHAT IF scenarios.. What IF the courland captains were as ambitious as you guys are? What IF denmark or Sweden did not sit still and expanded from their small holdings?

new feature proposals must come in an required form and must be voted by the community before they are even considered. If its not on top of the list its probably not a popular idea

May i suggest trying www.navalaction.com. France colonies in the Caribbean need captains

its a common false positive. But we will check and see if signing is correct because we recently updated the launcher https://howandwow.info/idp-generic/ - here is how to check underlying files (they should be ok) For peace of mind check the folder with the game with other antiviruses or windows defender. Сan you post the screenshots and send me the results of the virus check as a file in private? (PM) you can save them as a file). We will send them to xsolla so they fix the issue. They are a ok known payment service provider and many games work through them (Borderlands 3 and tarkov is sold through xsolla for example).