Now Servers Are Busy, Should Data Be Shared Between Them

[Sir Richard Bolitho]

Just tried it. Not only do I lose the gold, I lose all my ships as well! I don't really understand why would you not allow a one off switch for the reason I mentioned in my earlier post? Honestly.

[SteelSandwich]

Dont you see what kind of complications t adds?

You have ships in a harbor, in the other world another nation owns it.

You have 3 ships in a harbour and 4 in the other wold, when merged 2 get lost.

You have 4 contracts in wolrd 1, and 5 in world 2, 4 get destroyed automaticly.

You can have 20k iron in a low population world, yet bringing that to the other one will make you the richest man ingame.

Just to name a few of thr many reasons why ota not as easy as you would like it to be.

[Fluffy Fishy]

Dont you see what kind of complications t adds?

You have ships in a harbor, in the other world another nation owns it.

You have 3 ships in a harbour and 4 in the other wold, when merged 2 get lost.

You have 4 contracts in wolrd 1, and 5 in world 2, 4 get destroyed automaticly.

You can have 20k iron in a low population world, yet bringing that to the other one will make you the richest man ingame.

Just to name a few of thr many reasons why ota not as easy as you would like it to be.

 

I'm not sure about everyone else but you mostly persuaded me a while back, but its nice to see a discussion, I have gone from being pro gold and craft level to just craft level being shared, the idea of server long cool down migration is one I approve of and in reality you could solve some of the problems with the fact that only ships and warehouse stock in capitals can be retained in this situation? While I agree you have a lot of very good points, I still don't see it as catastrophically bad as you see it but you have made me think quite a lot about the issues . Also I never said anything about sharing ships, just gold and craft.