Help please - low frame rates

[Bolitho]

My computer setup is as follows:

 

ASUS CM6870|Quad Core|i7-3770 3.4GHz

 

12GB DDR3 RAM

 

2 TB HDD

 

nVidia GeForce GT630 2GB

 

Windows 8

 

I realise my video card is probably my weak link. I am currently getting 8 fps in OW and only slightly better in battle.

 

My video settings are all set on minimum and all antialiasing and other filters are OFF.

 

Resolution is 1920x1080

 

Is there any way I can configure my video card to improve my frame rates?

 

Thank you.

Edited December 15, 2015 by Bolitho

[_Alucard_]

You'd better purchase a new card. It's the weak point on your computer.

[Schuetzengel]

reduce your resolution and be sure water is on low

[Bolitho]

You'd better purchase a new card. It's the weak point on your computer.

Thanks.

Any suggestions?

Edited December 15, 2015 by Bolitho

[_Alucard_]

Thanks.

Any suggestions?

Well, it depends on your budget...

If that is not a problem, you could have a look at the Nvidia GTX 970....around 300-350€

[Bolitho]

Thank you very much.

[Goodblue]

Do you have AA enabled? That's also a big drop for frames.

[OlavDeng2]

Well, it depends on your budget...

If that is not a problem, you could have a look at the Nvidia GTX 970....around 300-350€

Usually now a days a r9 390 is a better buy if you have the power supply for it.

[AmericanSailor98]

Depends on your budget. GTX 750 ti if you have around $100 budget, r7 370 if you have around $150, R9 380 if you have $200, r9 390 if you got $300 and so on. I would not recommend the 970 at all. It's more expensive than the r9 390, and is also worse in performance, and r9 390 has directx12 support which will obviously gain even more fps in future games, but yea i believe you need a bit more watt for PSU for the 390. 

[Ned Loe]

Your video card can't handle it.

 

In Video Options do his:

 

AA - OFF

FXAA - ON

WATER - MID/LOW

FILTERING - MID/LOW

 

I got R9 390x with 8gb ram and I only get 52 fps on Ultra with 6 core cpu and 8gb ram. This game is very demanding. Also, never use antialasing it kills fps big time. 

 

Let's compare R9 270 vs GT630 1GB (In your case 2GB ram will add 5 fps)

 

 

Best choice would be to upgrade.

 

Here is what I would suggest to get on budget R9 280x 3GB($120 ebay) or R9 380x. These will guarantee you 30fps on high/ultra.  

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/ASUS-Radeon-R9-280X-R9280X-DC2T-3GD5-3GB-/161909841601?hash=item25b2941ec1:g:UCEAAOSwfZ1WZERU

[Bart Smith]

Well all was said here: you need better graphic card to run NA smooth.

[rayks83]

My computer setup is as follows:

 

ASUS CM6870|Quad Core|i7-3770 3.4GHz

 

12GB DDR3 RAM

 

2 TB HDD

 

nVidia GeForce GT630 2GB

 

Windows 8

 

I realise my video card is probably my weak link. I am currently getting 8 fps in OW and only slightly better in battle.

 

My video settings are all set on minimum and all antialiasing and other filters are OFF.

 

Resolution is 1920x1080

 

Is there any way I can configure my video card to improve my frame rates?

 

Thank you.

maybe ur video card is damaged, u may need to buy a new video card..

[OlavDeng2]

maybe ur video card is damaged, u may need to buy a new video card..

This is definetly not the case(that the card is damaged), it is a weak card and naval action is a demanding game, with a r9 270 @ 1080p i got 20-30 fps in decently sized battles with everything on minimum except the water(medium)

[OlavDeng2]

Your video card can't handle it.

 

In Video Options do his:

 

AA - OFF

FXAA - ON

WATER - MID/LOW

FILTERING - MID/LOW

 

I got R9 390x with 8gb ram and I only get 52 fps on Ultra with 6 core cpu and 8gb ram. This game is very demanding. Also, never use antialasing it kills fps big time. 

 

Let's compare R9 270 vs GT630 1GB (In your case 2GB ram will add 5 fps)

 

 

Best choice would be to upgrade.

 

Here is what I would suggest to get on budget R9 280x 3GB($120 ebay) or R9 380x. These will guarantee you 30fps on high/ultra.  

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/ASUS-Radeon-R9-280X-R9280X-DC2T-3GD5-3GB-/161909841601?hash=item25b2941ec1:g:UCEAAOSwfZ1WZERU

While you are not wrong, the website you used is something you should avoid as it uses a lot of info which does not matter for final performance(compute performance, shading units(cant compare these across architectures), clockspeeds(same as previous), RAM count(while it does matter, a 2GB r9 380 will beat a 4 GB gtx 950, RAM count again only matters when talking about the same core)

 

edit: you also did not read the OP, he said he had everything on the lowest allready.

Edited December 16, 2015 by OlavDeng2

[Count Maurice Benyovszky]

Yeah, the GPU is the problem. Probably the best bet would be GTX 970. However you can get a used 780Ti at around 250-300 $, the new 970 is around 350 $?
970s AMD counterpart is 390

[OlavDeng2]

Yeah, the GPU is the problem. Probably the best bet would be GTX 970. However you can get a used 780Ti at around 250-300 $, the new 970 is around 350 $?

970s AMD counterpart is 390

Just so you know, an r9 390 would probably be better than a gtx 970

[Count Maurice Benyovszky]

By a small margin, but it's still the closest one to 970.

Edited January 14, 2016 by Count Maurice Benyovszky