felelo Posted January 31, 2015 Posted January 31, 2015 AMD Bulldozer FX-8120 8-core Nvidia GeForce GTX-550 Ti 8Gb Corsair RAM Windows 7 Ultimate... I'm thinking abou upgrading my gear, any tips on where to begin?
Joegrag Posted January 31, 2015 Posted January 31, 2015 You should get a new gpu at first ,your cpu is pretty good. To my rig: i7 4770k GTX 680 4gb Samsung evo 840 500gb 8gb of crucial ballistix ram I am playing with 70fps on ultra when AA and vsync turned off - cause as far as i can see the effects aren t implemented yet.
Zehtuka Posted January 31, 2015 Posted January 31, 2015 i5 4690k @ 4.5 GhzR9 290 (1100|1400)16GB DDR3 2400 Mhz The game runs smooth although I disable AA and anisotropy to hover around 100-110 FPS for my 120 hz monitor
Guest raat Posted January 31, 2015 Posted January 31, 2015 Intel i7 5820k Haswell-E 6-core Asus Strix GTX 970 Corsair Dominator Platinum 16Gb 2666Mhz Ram
Pada Posted January 31, 2015 Posted January 31, 2015 CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970Memory: Corsair Vengeance 8 GB Windows 7 Home Premium At maximum settings I get solid 60 fps in normal battles and around 40 to 30 fps in battles with 20+ ships .
killerman97 Posted January 31, 2015 Posted January 31, 2015 will my freind be able to play on a laptop with radeon hd graphics and a amd 4400m apu he dosnt mind low fps
SirThawkz Posted January 31, 2015 Posted January 31, 2015 AMD A8-6600k AMD R9 280 (Overclocked) 8GB Ram Windows 7 Play on Ultra with everything maxed out and get 40-50 FPS.
OlavDeng2 Posted January 31, 2015 Posted January 31, 2015 AMD Bulldozer FX-8120 8-core Nvidia GeForce GTX-550 Ti 8Gb Corsair RAM Windows 7 Ultimate... I'm thinking abou upgrading my gear, any tips on where to begin? Upgrade your graphics card... everything else should be fine. 1
Rutger Van Hoorn Posted January 31, 2015 Posted January 31, 2015 Case: Rosewill BlackHawk-Ultra MB: ASUS Sabertooth Z77 CPU:i5-3570K@3.4GHz (+ oversized cooling block attached) RAM: 8 GB Grapics: AMD Radeon 7950 4GB Drives: Kingston HyperX 120GB SSD + 1 TB data drive OS: Win 7 Home Premium (Edit: not playing... yet)
felelo Posted February 1, 2015 Posted February 1, 2015 Upgrade your graphics card... everything else should be fine. Yes.... I'm researching about buying a nes Nvidia, around the 800 series, and using it together with my 550 Ti...
OlavDeng2 Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 Yes.... I'm researching about buying a nes Nvidia, around the 800 series, and using it together with my 550 Ti... if you need my help you can PM me, also NVidea has no 800 series for desktop parts and you cant put the 550 Ti in sli with anything but a 550 TI(just so you know)
Nuclearmoose Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 Processor: Intel I5-4690K @3.5GHz RAM: 16GB (4X4) at 9ms latency GPU: MSI GTX 970 Motherboard: MSI Z97 G45 Running off a SSD High: 100+ Ultra: 60 to 70 but dips below 60 in big battles When i OC i will update.
Wicked Mouse Posted February 2, 2015 Posted February 2, 2015 i7 930 @ 2.9GHz Intel DX58SO mobo 8GB DDR3 RAM Radeon 5870 1GB VRAM Win7 x64 Play on high 40-50 FPS, Ultra it drops significantly to like 15 FPS.
ObiQuiet Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 This is a useful thread... My mainboard has barnacles and seaweed slowing it down, and I can't find the right Windows 7 64lb driver for my new carronades. I'll have to careen the case and downgrade to 32 pounders. That bluetoothed master gunner is no good either, and should be replaced. The bow chasers are on a Universal Swivel Base, so that's at least good. The RAM on the bowsprit is rather small, and I think the stern Windows weren't installed correctly. The holystone deck drive (HDD) is large, about the size of ten of the captains' gigs, and contributes to the ship's hogging. I think a torredo worm has gotten to the coppering... oh dear. Am saving up for an Armada Micro Destroyer shipset..... 1
Ned Loe Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 AMD 1100t x6 @ 4ghz 8gb ddr 3 1800 r9 280x 3gb video Win 7 64bit All Ultra, x2 antialiasing = 60+ solid fps.
SuperEtendard Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Intel i5 3450 @ 3.10 GHzRAM 12 Gb DDR3 1333 Hz KingstonGPU GT 630 with 2Gb DDR3.I am fine with the processor and the RAM, but the GT 630 is underperfomer, and i noticed it in many games. I can play with custom settings at 20~25 fps. This setup leads to very curious results, have to put water on low, and 0 antialising . Other things such as anisotropic filtering and texture quality between low and max there isn't fps differences over 2 or 3 at mostly, so i have full anisotropic and medium textures. Lightning on low aswell.
Admaa Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 I bought the cheapest parts I could get hold of a few years ago. Still wish I waited and bought a better i7 instead. Processor: Intel Sandybridge i5-2500K Quad-Core 3.30GHz, 6MB CacheMotherboard: ASUS 1155 SABERTOOTH P67 REV 3.0 S/LRAM: Corsair Vengeance 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1600 Mhz Graphics Card: GTX 580 DirectCu II (1.56GB)Memory: WD Caviar Green 2TB SATA 6Gbp/s + Seagate 1TB 6Gb/s OS: Windows 7 64-bitI can play on custom (Highest) When I use ultra preset I get some peformance issues and to be honest it doesn't look any different than the highest custom settings, which is rather curious.Usually I get 60-90 FPS, but in massive Trafalgar battles I get around 30-45.
OlavDeng2 Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 I bought the cheapest parts I could get hold of a few years ago. Still wish I waited and bought a better i7 instead. Processor: Intel Sandybridge i5-2500K Quad-Core 3.30GHz, 6MB Cache Motherboard: ASUS 1155 SABERTOOTH P67 REV 3.0 S/L RAM: Corsair Vengeance 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1600 Mhz Graphics Card: GTX 580 DirectCu II (1.56GB) Memory: WD Caviar Green 2TB SATA 6Gbp/s + Seagate 1TB 6Gb/s OS: Windows 7 64-bit I can play on custom (Highest) When I use ultra preset I get some peformance issues and to be honest it doesn't look any different than the highest custom settings, which is rather curious. Usually I get 60-90 FPS, but in massive Trafalgar battles I get around 30-45. Honestly, an i7 would not make a difference in anything but things like video rendering, photoshop, 3d modeling, streaming and other more professional and demanding tasks, gaming wouldnt make a single differance, if you want more performance overclock your cpu as you can do that
Admaa Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Honestly, an i7 would not make a difference in anything but things like video rendering, photoshop, 3d modeling, streaming and other more professional and demanding tasks, gaming wouldnt make a single differance, if you want more performance overclock your cpu as you can do that Ah, alright man, sweet. I figured the threading and cache was more of a improvement than the i5 (on the day of purchase/research) I thought that was still the case? Saying that, I've kinda been out of the loop for new hardware since! I've had no problems with it for the 4ish years I've had the i5, and would gladly overclock rather than spend £200 on a new processor that doesn't improve the peformance as much. Was considering buying a SSD for my OS, but that's the only improvement I can really think of, besides a new GPU at some point in the next 2-3 years.
ObiQuiet Posted February 5, 2015 Posted February 5, 2015 I found this an informative and credible source in making a processor choice: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-core-i5-4690k-core-i7-4790k-review
Mike Walker Posted February 5, 2015 Posted February 5, 2015 Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Language: English (Regional Setting: English) System Manufacturer: Me Processor: Intel® Core i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz Memory: 6144MB RAM DirectX Version: DirectX 11 --------------- Display Devices --------------- Card name: AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series Display Memory: 4095 MB Current Mode: 1920 x 1200 (32 bit) (60Hz) Monitor Name: ViewSonic VX2640w Monitor Model: VX2640w Monitor Id: VSC8420 Native Mode: 1920 x 1200(p) (59.950Hz) Output Type: HDMI ------------- Sound Devices ------------- Description: Speakers (Realtek High Definition Audio)
chrizzo Posted February 5, 2015 Posted February 5, 2015 Running very smooth at Ultra Settings on my system with following specs: CPU: i5 2500K @ 4.8Ghz GPU: AMD r9 290 @ 1150/1350 RAM: 8Gb DDR3 The only thing i notice is, that almost every alpha game is silly optimised (due to their state of developement), so they drain a lot power from your CPU and not GPU. Upgrading to a newer CPU with a better thread handling etc improves way more than just clock speed. Cause i got at least two alpha games, where my CPU is on limit and my GPU idles around, resulting in a 200+ framerate and still a laggy or slow gameplay. (a newer CPU like Xeon with 3.4Ghz handles the same situation with a way smoother gameplay) So if you consider in playing alpha games you may think of getting a newer generation of CPU. Else every new medicore CPU will do fine and should be enough for every finished game.
OlavDeng2 Posted February 5, 2015 Posted February 5, 2015 Ah, alright man, sweet. I figured the threading and cache was more of a improvement than the i5 (on the day of purchase/research) I thought that was still the case? Saying that, I've kinda been out of the loop for new hardware since! I've had no problems with it for the 4ish years I've had the i5, and would gladly overclock rather than spend £200 on a new processor that doesn't improve the peformance as much. Was considering buying a SSD for my OS, but that's the only improvement I can really think of, besides a new GPU at some point in the next 2-3 years. Thing about the cache is that you dont really notice much of a differance with that, the thing with threads, it is a rare breed to see anything that even uses 4 trheads(most use 2 threads(or cores if you want) today), so you would pay a lot more for no extra performance in gaming.
Recommended Posts