Mighty_Mo Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 hey again everyone there was a different subject than the previous one I did about the accessorys for the ship... this topic I wanna suggest about the cannons knock back what's obviously missing in the gameplay because as we know in real live thecannons recoil is massive when its fired that its knock back inside the ship for the next reload. that is something I'm missing while playing the game as well. leave a comment here of what you all think of this suggestion:) 1
z4ys Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 (edited) Bevor the Game was EA recoil was in-game but it let the fps drop in a massive way in big scale battles. Feel free to do the math and calculate it for all broadside guns of 50 santis shooting at the same time😉 If I remember correctly we might get it back as graphic option for high high end machines. Edited May 17, 2018 by z4ys 1
Sella Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 The engine has changed so it might not be as bad now. Plus there could be an option to switch it on and off 1
z4ys Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 7 minutes ago, rediii said: I hope we get it back as a opt in. 7 minutes ago, Sella22 said: The engine has changed so it might not be as bad now. Plus there could be an option to switch it on and off Might even be a good feature if there would be the option to activate full crew + recoil on your own ship and/or on all ships. But looking at all the screenshot most people play on really low settings so I would rate its on a very low dev prio 1
Wind Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 (edited) Gun Shadows, Gun recoil all system heavy. Thing is some people have decent machines to run it all. It should be added as an option. Edited May 17, 2018 by Wind
Capt Jubal Early Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 4 hours ago, Captain Aaron Mograine said: hey again everyone there was a different subject than the previous one I did about the accessorys for the ship... this topic I wanna suggest about the cannons knock back what's obviously missing in the gameplay because as we know in real live thecannons recoil is massive when its fired that its knock back inside the ship for the next reload. that is something I'm missing while playing the game as well. leave a comment here of what you all think of this suggestion:) A lot of the visuals your posting about have been raised time and time again. Use the search function on the forum to find the discussions regarding graphics, ship accessory's and paints etc.
vazco Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 Having guns being recoiled as non-optional could allow to remove indication of number of reloaded guns of your enemy - you could have to guess it by gun positions on enemy vessel. It's a pitty we probably can't have this due to performance issues.
StaleMemes Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 While I'm sure rolling the guns would be graphically intensive, what about just switching to a different model (gun withdrawn, port closed while reloading) as each gun fires. The change would not be very noticeable in the smoke and flash, and would still be more immersive than the recoilless guns we have now.
Vernon Merrill Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 This is probably all stuff they will do for eye candy once they get around to optimization.... Right now, my PC works noticeably harder playing NA than PUBG.....
Sir William Hargood Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 27 minutes ago, Capt Aerobane said: While I'm sure rolling the guns would be graphically intensive, what about just switching to a different model (gun withdrawn, port closed while reloading) as each gun fires. The change would not be very noticeable in the smoke and flash, and would still be more immersive than the recoilless guns we have now. Just a note: The port lids would not close between reloading otherwise the you would not be able to use the ramrod. They would open at "beat to quarters" and stay that way for the duration of the battle. But you have a point: a re-coiling gun could hardly be as system intensive as each gun's muzzle flash and smoke. Smoke is notoriously resource intensive.
StaleMemes Posted May 18, 2018 Posted May 18, 2018 9 hours ago, Sir William Hargood said: Just a note: The port lids would not close between reloading otherwise the you would not be able to use the ramrod. They would open at "beat to quarters" and stay that way for the duration of the battle. But you have a point: a re-coiling gun could hardly be as system intensive as each gun's muzzle flash and smoke. Smoke is notoriously resource intensive. Good point, so that actually means it would be even less graphically intensive because only the cannons would have to change, the hull and ports would stay open.
Sir William Hargood Posted May 18, 2018 Posted May 18, 2018 4 hours ago, Capt Aerobane said: Good point, so that actually means it would be even less graphically intensive because only the cannons would have to change, the hull and ports would stay open. Yes. I would suggest that the ship's default state be gun-ports open and the guns run out: battle stations as it were. And during battle, therefor only in battle instances, only the guns re-coiling and running out once loaded be added to the animation sequence. Far less intensive than the smoke and cannon ball tracking of each cannon ball in the air. Therefor gun-port lids never change.
Mighty_Mo Posted May 18, 2018 Author Posted May 18, 2018 22 hours ago, z4ys said: Might even be a good feature if there would be the option to activate full crew + recoil on your own ship and/or on all ships. But looking at all the screenshot most people play on really low settings so I would rate its on a very low dev prio i got a good computer to run that, since i got a streaming studio/mancave/bedroom no problem to run it on my side give me mah cannon knock back
Hethwill, the Red Duke Posted May 18, 2018 Posted May 18, 2018 ...okaaaay... this suggestion is as old as NA But regarding gamer machine processing power... Gimme more code that simulates wind variation rather than flashy gizmos. Gimme realistic outcomes of rigging during battle and in wind - blocks and lines being cut, masts unsupported from shrouds - than the eye candy sugar that is meaningless in the combat simulation. 5
admin Posted May 18, 2018 Posted May 18, 2018 On 5/17/2018 at 11:57 AM, rediii said: I hope we get it back as a opt in. We wont most likely a) priorities b ) cannon recoil consumes fps even if it is off as an option. Not integrated parts of hull use more resources even if they are not animated. 4
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now