Guest Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 11 hours ago, Malachy said: Neither the brits or the us considered her a 4th. Those were the only two navies that mattered at the time. The only people who consider her a 4th is game labs and they admitted they did it for balance reasons. And that's just beginning of the BR-balancing kerfuffle that we're about to embark on. To think that, in a PB setting, equal numbers of constis would be able to take on equal numbers of Wasas seems a bit ridiculous.
Malachy Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 4 hours ago, Aegir said: And that's just beginning of the BR-balancing kerfuffle that we're about to embark on. To think that, in a PB setting, equal numbers of constis would be able to take on equal numbers of Wasas seems a bit ridiculous. The wasa wasn't even combat viable. It sank in harbor. The Connie was designed to be able to hold its own against the older 64s, maybe even a 74 in a pinch.
Guest Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 13 minutes ago, Malachy said: The wasa wasn't even combat viable. It sank in harbor. No for the hundredmillions times. That was a different W(V)asa that sunk when leaving the port for her first time.
IndianaGeoff Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 You have to love any ship from France called the Beautiful Chicken. 1
Malachy Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 16 hours ago, Jœrnson said: No for the hundredmillions times. That was a different W(V)asa that sunk when leaving the port for her first time. The only reference I can find for a ship of that name is the one that sunk. So please link the one that you think it is. The one that foundered was also a 64 with similar gun layout to the one in game.
Guest Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 53 minutes ago, Malachy said: The only reference I can find for a ship of that name is the one that sunk. So please link the one that you think it is. The one that foundered was also a 64 with similar gun layout to the one in game. https://digitaltmuseum.org/021176498282/kronprins-gustaf-adolf-1782 What we have in game is the Wasa class ship Kronprins Gustaf Adolph designed by Chapman 1782. The ingame name Wasa is just wrong and should be renamed. See above thread.
Malachy Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 (edited) 6 hours ago, Jœrnson said: https://digitaltmuseum.org/021176498282/kronprins-gustaf-adolf-1782 What we have in game is the Wasa class ship Kronprins Gustaf Adolph designed by Chapman 1782. The ingame name Wasa is just wrong and should be renamed. See above thread. the art doesn't look right and the gun count doesn't seem to match right. So looks like we got some game labs idea of a Swedish 4th. And looking at commissioned Swedish ships, a whole lot of them were captured by shitty navies like Russia lol. For being Viking stock the swedes sure lost their fighting and sailing ability at some point. Edited October 12, 2017 by Malachy
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now