[CARIBBEAN] RECORDED HISTORY. Clan power ranking (rvr) #updated 26/10/18

[Guest]

47 minutes ago, Fenris said:

I dont believe you are.

lol but wouldn't you reheeally want to find out?... I think it's safe to assume I'm wealthier than the entire JG4 clan.....

[Guest]

10 minutes ago, Banished Privateer said:

I believe his main indiaman dumped cargo? Why would it be empty...

Standard policy.. I'll have a word with him tho - standard policy is to sink all ai indiamans when tagged..

[Guest]

35 minutes ago, Banished Privateer said:

That's rude... Don't ruin privateering and hunting.

Basic rule of econ warfare - deprive the enemy of any assets and make sure to safeguard your own.. If the latter fails? - burn down the farm..

[Fenris]

5 hours ago, Lars Kjaer said:

lol but wouldn't you reheeally want to find out?... I think it's safe to assume I'm wealthier than the entire JG4 clan.....

I dont need to find that out, because i know you arent the richest on server.

 

[qw569😳]

RvR for March 2018 according Mishka

Number of PB except Neutrals	96
successfully defended	45
successfully attacked	51

Clans

 

Total clans in RvR 57
Top 20 clan with number of PB
Clan	Number of PB	Succesfully ratio
RSC	17	47.06%
VLTRA	15	20.00%
DNP	9	55.56%
WO	9	22.22%
REDS	7	100.00%
CABAL	7	57.14%
HRE	6	33.33%
VCA	6	66.67%
7UP	6	66.67%
HANSA	5	80.00%
LIONS	5	40.00%
CSA	5	60.00%
DRAKE	4	75.00%
ALOHA	4	75.00%
TALER	4	75.00%
PFK	4	50.00%
SLRN	3	66.67%
SALTP	3	33.33%
VWIC	3	33.33%
FP	3	33.33%

Ports

 

Top 10 ports ordered by number of PB
Port	Number of PB
Mangrove Cay	3
Nippes	3
Chinchorro	3
Perijá	2
Samaná	2
El Toco	2
West End	2
Congrios	2
Cayman Brac	2
Little Cayman	2

Battles

 

Top 10 most short port battles

31 min [27-03-2018 00:26 UTC] The port battle for Turtle Cay (France) is scheduled for 28 Mar 2018 00:25 UTC. Defender: VCA. Attacker: CBR (United States). BR: 2280 [28-03-2018 00:56 UTC] Turtle Cay captured by CBR (United States). Previous owner: VCA (France)

31 min [13-03-2018 21:26 UTC] The port battle for Píritu (Sverige) is scheduled for 14 Mar 2018 21:25 UTC. Defender: CABAL. Attacker: LIONS (Verenigde Provinciën). BR: 5380 [14-03-2018 21:56 UTC] Píritu captured by LIONS (Verenigde Provinciën). Previous owner: CABAL (Sverige)

32 min [30-03-2018 20:21 UTC] The port battle for Islamorada (Sverige) is scheduled for 31 Mar 2018 20:19 UTC. Defender: CABAL. Attacker: REDS (Russian Empire). BR: 5140 [31-03-2018 20:51 UTC] Islamorada captured by REDS (Russian Empire). Previous owner: CABAL (Sverige)

32 min [15-03-2018 22:06 UTC] The port battle for Monte Cristi (France) is scheduled for 16 Mar 2018 22:04 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). BR: 7920 [16-03-2018 22:36 UTC] Monte Cristi captured by HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). Previous owner: WO (France)

35 min [09-03-2018 21:41 UTC] The port battle for La Isabela (France) is scheduled for 10 Mar 2018 21:36 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). BR: 5140 [10-03-2018 22:11 UTC] La Isabela captured by HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). Previous owner: WO (France)

36 min [28-03-2018 18:41 UTC] The port battle for Prinzapolka (France) is scheduled for 29 Mar 2018 18:37 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: STSS (Great Britain). BR: 5240 [29-03-2018 19:13 UTC] Prinzapolka captured by STSS (Great Britain). Previous owner: WO (France)

36 min [16-03-2018 14:51 UTC] The port battle for Triunfo de la Cruz (France) is scheduled for 17 Mar 2018 14:50 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: EAR (Great Britain). BR: 8210 [17-03-2018 15:26 UTC] Triunfo de la Cruz captured by EAR (Great Britain). Previous owner: WO (France)

37 min [03-03-2018 13:56 UTC] The port battle for Turtle Cay (Great Britain) is scheduled for 4 Mar 2018 13:54 UTC. Defender: RSC. Attacker: VCA (France). BR: 2280 [04-03-2018 14:31 UTC] Turtle Cay captured by VCA (France). Previous owner: RSC (Great Britain)

37 min [03-03-2018 12:46 UTC] The port battle for Port Howe (Great Britain) is scheduled for 4 Mar 2018 12:44 UTC. Defender: RSC. Attacker: BABO (Pirates). BR: 2180 [04-03-2018 13:21 UTC] Port Howe captured by BABO (Pirates). Previous owner: RSC (Great Britain)

38 min [21-03-2018 19:51 UTC] The port battle for San Marcos (Russian Empire) is scheduled for 22 Mar 2018 19:48 UTC. Defender: REDS. Attacker: VLTRA (España). BR: 2780 [22-03-2018 20:26 UTC] San Marcos defended by REDS (Russian Empire) against VLTRA (España)

Top 10 most long port battles

240 min [07-03-2018 12:46 UTC] The port battle for Mangrove Cay (Great Britain) is scheduled for 8 Mar 2018 12:46 UTC. Defender: RSC. Attacker: MAD47 (United States). BR: 1120 [08-03-2018 16:46 UTC] Mangrove Cay defended by RSC (Great Britain) against MAD47 (United States)

124 min [13-03-2018 00:56 UTC] The port battle for Road Rocks (Great Britain) is scheduled for 14 Mar 2018 00:52 UTC. Defender: STSS. Attacker: CSA (United States). BR: 1060 [14-03-2018 02:56 UTC] Road Rocks captured by CSA (United States). Previous owner: STSS (Great Britain)

118 min [14-03-2018 20:21 UTC] The port battle for Samaná (Sverige) is scheduled for 15 Mar 2018 20:18 UTC. Defender: HRE. Attacker: TALER (Kingdom of Prussia). BR: 8070 [15-03-2018 22:16 UTC] Samaná defended by HRE (Sverige) against TALER (Kingdom of Prussia)

116 min [27-03-2018 20:46 UTC] The port battle for Coro (Verenigde Provinciën) is scheduled for 28 Mar 2018 20:45 UTC. Defender: VNM. Attacker: CABAL (Sverige). BR: 10370 [28-03-2018 22:41 UTC] Coro defended by VNM (Verenigde Provinciën) against CABAL (Sverige)

116 min [03-03-2018 12:51 UTC] The port battle for Alabaster Rocks (Great Britain) is scheduled for 4 Mar 2018 12:50 UTC. Defender: RSC. Attacker: FP (Pirates). BR: 1050 [04-03-2018 14:46 UTC] Alabaster Rocks defended by RSC (Great Britain) against FP (Pirates)

115 min [12-03-2018 19:56 UTC] The port battle for Cayman Brac (Danmark-Norge) is scheduled for 13 Mar 2018 19:51 UTC. Defender: DNP. Attacker: VLTRA (España). BR: 2620 [13-03-2018 21:46 UTC] Cayman Brac defended by DNP (Danmark-Norge) against VLTRA (España)

114 min [04-03-2018 19:06 UTC] The port battle for Manataca (Kingdom of Prussia) is scheduled for 5 Mar 2018 19:02 UTC. Defender: ALOHA. Attacker: VLTRA (España). BR: 2640 [05-03-2018 20:56 UTC] Manataca defended by ALOHA (Kingdom of Prussia) against VLTRA (España)

113 min [19-03-2018 00:46 UTC] The port battle for New Smyrna (United States) is scheduled for 20 Mar 2018 00:43 UTC. Defender: RAM. Attacker: SALTY (Kingdom of Prussia). BR: 2520 [20-03-2018 02:36 UTC] New Smyrna captured by SALTY (Kingdom of Prussia). Previous owner: RAM (United States)

112 min [17-03-2018 02:41 UTC] The port battle for Mangrove Cay (Great Britain) is scheduled for 18 Mar 2018 02:39 UTC. Defender: RSC. Attacker: CSA (United States). BR: 1120 [18-03-2018 04:31 UTC] Mangrove Cay defended by RSC (Great Britain) against CSA (United States)

112 min [07-03-2018 21:01 UTC] The port battle for El Toco (Great Britain) is scheduled for 8 Mar 2018 20:59 UTC. Defender: EXILE. Attacker: EDR (France). BR: 2640 [08-03-2018 22:51 UTC] El Toco defended by EXILE (Great Britain) against EDR (France)

Edited April 2, 2018 by qw569

[King of Crowns]

8 minutes ago, qw569 said:

still editing

March 2018

Number of PB except Neutrals	96
successfully defended	45
successfully attacked	51

Clans

  Hide contents

Total clans in RvR 57
Top 20 clan with number of PB
Clan	Number of PB	Succesfully ratio
RSC	17	47.06%
VLTRA	15	20.00%
DNP	9	55.56%
WO	9	22.22%
REDS	7	100.00%
CABAL	7	57.14%
HRE	6	33.33%
VCA	6	66.67%
7UP	6	66.67%
HANSA	5	80.00%
LIONS	5	40.00%
CSA	5	60.00%
DRAKE	4	75.00%
ALOHA	4	75.00%
TALER	4	75.00%
PFK	4	50.00%
SLRN	3	66.67%
SALTP	3	33.33%
VWIC	3	33.33%
FP	3	33.33%

Ports

 

this percentage doesn't include uncontested pbs I guess? so when the eu guys flipped all of ports with no timer our (WO) pb win ratio tanked?

[qw569😳]

3 minutes ago, King of Crowns said:

this percentage doesn't include uncontested pbs I guess? so when the eu guys flipped all of ports with no timer our (WO) pb win ratio tanked?

I think your clan forgot about timers

Raw data of WO activity

Clan	Succesfully Defend	Failed Attack	Succesfully Attack	Failed Defend	Total battles	Succesfully	Succesfully ratio
WO	0	1	2	6	9	2	22.22%

51 min [09-03-2018 20:46 UTC] The port battle for Nippes (France) is scheduled for 10 Mar 2018 20:45 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: DRAKE (Great Britain). BR: 5090 [10-03-2018 21:36 UTC] Nippes captured by DRAKE (Great Britain). Previous owner: WO (France)

35 min [09-03-2018 21:41 UTC] The port battle for La Isabela (France) is scheduled for 10 Mar 2018 21:36 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). BR: 5140 [10-03-2018 22:11 UTC] La Isabela captured by HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). Previous owner: WO (France)

32 min [15-03-2018 22:06 UTC] The port battle for Monte Cristi (France) is scheduled for 16 Mar 2018 22:04 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). BR: 7920 [16-03-2018 22:36 UTC] Monte Cristi captured by HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). Previous owner: WO (France)

36 min [16-03-2018 14:51 UTC] The port battle for Triunfo de la Cruz (France) is scheduled for 17 Mar 2018 14:50 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: EAR (Great Britain). BR: 8210 [17-03-2018 15:26 UTC] Triunfo de la Cruz captured by EAR (Great Britain). Previous owner: WO (France)

40 min [16-03-2018 23:41 UTC] The port battle for Fort-Dauphin (France) is scheduled for 17 Mar 2018 23:36 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: PGP (Kingdom of Prussia). BR: 8210 [18-03-2018 00:16 UTC] Fort-Dauphin captured by PGP (Kingdom of Prussia). Previous owner: WO (France)

40 min [27-03-2018 02:51 UTC] The port battle for San Agustín (United States) is scheduled for 28 Mar 2018 02:51 UTC. Defender: TURN. Attacker: WO (France). BR: 10080 [28-03-2018 03:31 UTC] San Agustín defended by TURN (United States) against WO (France)

36 min [28-03-2018 18:41 UTC] The port battle for Prinzapolka (France) is scheduled for 29 Mar 2018 18:37 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: STSS (Great Britain). BR: 5240 [29-03-2018 19:13 UTC] Prinzapolka captured by STSS (Great Britain). Previous owner: WO (France)

50 min [29-03-2018 02:21 UTC] The port battle for Terre-de-Bas (Sverige) is scheduled for 30 Mar 2018 02:21 UTC. Defender: HRE. Attacker: WO (France). BR: 2570 [30-03-2018 03:11 UTC] Terre-de-Bas captured by WO (France). Previous owner: HRE (Sverige)

73 min [29-03-2018 07:16 UTC] The port battle for San Mateo (United States) is scheduled for 30 Mar 2018 07:13 UTC. Defender: MARS. Attacker: WO (France). BR: 5480 [30-03-2018 08:26 UTC] San Mateo captured by WO (France). Previous owner: MARS (United States)

[King of Crowns]

4 minutes ago, qw569 said:

I think your clan forgot about timers

Raw data of WO activity

Clan	Succesfully Defend	Failed Attack	Succesfully Attack	Failed Defend	Total battles	Succesfully	Succesfully ratio
WO	0	1	2	6	9	2	22.22%

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

51 min [09-03-2018 20:46 UTC] The port battle for Nippes (France) is scheduled for 10 Mar 2018 20:45 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: DRAKE (Great Britain). BR: 5090 [10-03-2018 21:36 UTC] Nippes captured by DRAKE (Great Britain). Previous owner: WO (France)

35 min [09-03-2018 21:41 UTC] The port battle for La Isabela (France) is scheduled for 10 Mar 2018 21:36 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). BR: 5140 [10-03-2018 22:11 UTC] La Isabela captured by HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). Previous owner: WO (France)

32 min [15-03-2018 22:06 UTC] The port battle for Monte Cristi (France) is scheduled for 16 Mar 2018 22:04 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). BR: 7920 [16-03-2018 22:36 UTC] Monte Cristi captured by HANSA (Kingdom of Prussia). Previous owner: WO (France)

36 min [16-03-2018 14:51 UTC] The port battle for Triunfo de la Cruz (France) is scheduled for 17 Mar 2018 14:50 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: EAR (Great Britain). BR: 8210 [17-03-2018 15:26 UTC] Triunfo de la Cruz captured by EAR (Great Britain). Previous owner: WO (France)

40 min [16-03-2018 23:41 UTC] The port battle for Fort-Dauphin (France) is scheduled for 17 Mar 2018 23:36 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: PGP (Kingdom of Prussia). BR: 8210 [18-03-2018 00:16 UTC] Fort-Dauphin captured by PGP (Kingdom of Prussia). Previous owner: WO (France)

40 min [27-03-2018 02:51 UTC] The port battle for San Agustín (United States) is scheduled for 28 Mar 2018 02:51 UTC. Defender: TURN. Attacker: WO (France). BR: 10080 [28-03-2018 03:31 UTC] San Agustín defended by TURN (United States) against WO (France)

36 min [28-03-2018 18:41 UTC] The port battle for Prinzapolka (France) is scheduled for 29 Mar 2018 18:37 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: STSS (Great Britain). BR: 5240 [29-03-2018 19:13 UTC] Prinzapolka captured by STSS (Great Britain). Previous owner: WO (France)

50 min [29-03-2018 02:21 UTC] The port battle for Terre-de-Bas (Sverige) is scheduled for 30 Mar 2018 02:21 UTC. Defender: HRE. Attacker: WO (France). BR: 2570 [30-03-2018 03:11 UTC] Terre-de-Bas captured by WO (France). Previous owner: HRE (Sverige)

73 min [29-03-2018 07:16 UTC] The port battle for San Mateo (United States) is scheduled for 30 Mar 2018 07:13 UTC. Defender: MARS. Attacker: WO (France). BR: 5480 [30-03-2018 08:26 UTC] San Mateo captured by WO (France). Previous owner: MARS (United States)

 

 

yea we didn't put defense timers on our ports. costs to much. only kept valueable ports. the failed defend number are all empty pbs vs WO. because it was during the middle of the work day for... failed attack must be us getting screened out. (San Augustine) so yet again another empty pb.  as far as I know the only PB we have lost since the merge was HAT. 

Edited April 2, 2018 by King of Crowns

[King of Crowns]

@qw569 whats the time limit on these stats? we defended AYS and navase since the merge. not sure if these stats are just within a month or what.

[qw569😳]

Just now, King of Crowns said:

@qw569 whats the time limit on these stats? we defended AYS and navase since the merge. not sure if these stats are just within a month or what.

March 2018 (01 Mar 2018 - 31 Mar 2018)

Port Battles for Ays and La Navasse was in Feb 2018

• [11-02-2018 05:41 UTC] The port battle for Ays (France) is scheduled for 12 Feb 2018 05:38 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: NPG (United States). BR: 4800
• [10-02-2018 03:46 UTC] The port battle for La Navasse (France) is scheduled for 11 Feb 2018 03:43 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: CKA. BR: 2400
• [01-02-2018 03:52 UTC] The port battle for Ays (United States) is scheduled for 2 Feb 2018 03:51 UTC. Defender: RAM. Attacker: WO (France). BR: 4800

[King of Crowns]

3 minutes ago, qw569 said:

March 2018 (01 Mar 2018 - 31 Mar 2018)

Port Battles for Ays and La Navasse was in Feb 2018

• [11-02-2018 05:41 UTC] The port battle for Ays (France) is scheduled for 12 Feb 2018 05:38 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: NPG (United States). BR: 4800
• [10-02-2018 03:46 UTC] The port battle for La Navasse (France) is scheduled for 11 Feb 2018 03:43 UTC. Defender: WO. Attacker: CKA. BR: 2400
• [01-02-2018 03:52 UTC] The port battle for Ays (United States) is scheduled for 2 Feb 2018 03:51 UTC. Defender: RAM. Attacker: WO (France). BR: 4800

okay I understand now. so its just for the month. and its just api data. and doesn't include whether or not there were defenders or attackers in the port. 

[qw569😳]

Statistical Institute of Inagua

Weekly report 26/03/2018-01/04/2018 (prev report)

Revenue by nations

Nation	Tax	Cost	Revenue	Max Captured Ports
Pirates	33 382 460	40 679 776	-7 297 316	19
Danmark-Norge	33 223 227	71 600 146	-38 376 919	31
France	59 172 736	102 238 917	-43 066 181	47
Great Britain	34 140 651	84 094 846	-49 954 195	40
España	32 149 085	49 281 616	-17 132 531	55
United States	27 480 668	35 706 534	-8 225 866	15
Sverige	130 834 466	127 655 999	3 178 467	55
Verenigde Provinciën	8 699 140	37 294 812	-28 595 672	16
Russian Empire	26 746 806	29 566 257	-2 819 451	16
Kingdom of Prussia	36 641 955	39 858 921	-3 216 966	20
Commonwealth of Poland	3 248 504	10 500 000	-7 251 496	10

Daily reports are available at this link

 

Revenue by clans (highest revenue)

Clan	Tax	Cost	Revenue
HRE	81 089 650	57 876 446	23 213 204
XXXXX	9 616 172	4 149 809	5 466 363
HREKK	13 028 285	8 540 000	4 488 285
7UP	9 376 131	4 970 000	4 406 131
WO	19 061 761	14 665 509	4 396 252
HANSA	12 011 679	8 258 735	3 752 944
WTF	8 185 357	4 659 967	3 525 390
RIVAL	10 341 383	7 522 064	2 819 319
GOD	3 038 530	808 978	2 229 552
REDS	21 621 126	20 256 257	1 364 869

Revenue by clans (lowest revenue)

Clan	Tax	Cost	Revenue
DNP	12 935 579	42 739 621	-29 804 042
CBC	12 523 207	29 842 961	-17 319 754
PERVS	3 055 248	20 370 000	-17 314 752
CH	1 624 025	18 090 000	-16 465 975
CABAL	19 243 925	29 440 000	-10 196 075
VCA	2 312 685	12 100 000	-9 787 315
SLRN	1 316 207	10 700 000	-9 383 793
FP	362 052	8 400 000	-8 037 948
BLANC	488 452	8 400 000	-7 911 548
VLTRA	12 199 186	20 091 616	-7 892 430

Revenue by ports (highest revenue)

Port	Tax	Cost	Revenue
Nassau	21 892 880	6 567 861	15 325 019
Cartagena de Indias	20 635 319	6 190 593	14 444 726
La Navasse	12 782 813	4 217 676	8 565 137
Cumaná	12 550 717	4 200 000	8 350 717
Esteros	12 059 211	4 079 809	7 979 402
Bluefields	9 992 817	4 322 064	5 670 753
Puerto de España	11 587 786	5 935 447	5 652 339
Little Cayman	9 366 866	4 270 000	5 096 866
Saint John's	9 006 634	4 270 000	4 736 634
Campeche	5 631 974	1 185 215	4 446 759

Monthly report March 2018 (prev report)

Revenue by nations

Nation	Tax	Cost	Revenue	Max Captured Ports
Pirates	102 572 551	197 389 438	-94 816 887	23
Danmark-Norge	120 835 597	309 473 574	-188 637 977	31
France	250 955 998	494 710 168	-243 754 170	52
Great Britain	161 296 034	441 052 364	-279 756 330	59
España	145 831 768	275 650 453	-129 818 685	57
United States	100 868 062	131 838 390	-30 970 328	18
Sverige	607 009 412	628 403 330	-21 393 918	57
Verenigde Provinciën	38 831 580	187 536 586	-148 705 006	21
Russian Empire	112 472 474	146 084 962	-33 612 488	18
Kingdom of Prussia	126 669 991	182 601 642	-55 931 651	20
Commonwealth of Poland	14 727 768	43 841 164	-29 113 396	12

 

Revenue by clans (highest revenue)

Clan	Tax	Cost	Revenue
HRE	348 970 263	267 422 681	81 547 582
7UP	52 062 136	22 032 460	30 029 676
HREKK	58 267 885	37 104 923	21 162 962
XXXXX	8 343 486	2 949 809	5 393 677
GJ	12 992 441	7 673 798	5 318 643
RIVAL	11 452 046	7 339 705	4 112 341
LIONS	4 577 842	1 959 061	2 618 781
GOD	10 534 944	8 381 779	2 153 165
PGP	3 046 988	1 500 000	1 546 988
R0GUE	3 124 401	1 927 038	1 197 363

Revenue by clans (lowest revenue)

Clan	Tax	Cost	Revenue
DNP	52 294 030	187 549 362	-135 255 332
CH	8 112 346	94 717 860	-86 605 514
PERVS	11 485 261	93 570 120	-82 084 859
CBC	28 660 892	105 742 681	-77 081 789
VLTRA	51 028 359	107 909 964	-56 881 605
CABAL	105 789 387	160 727 506	-54 938 119
SLRN	7 373 491	62 054 433	-54 680 942
ER	42 050 454	87 533 562	-45 483 108
SH	1 485 766	43 500 000	-42 014 234
VCA	5 666 876	44 733 002	-39 066 126

Revenue by ports (highest revenue)

Port	Tax	Cost	Revenue
Cartagena de Indias	106 242 067	35 765 930	70 476 137
Nassau	67 162 390	23 587 270	43 575 120
Cumaná	63 764 222	20 246 371	43 517 851
Esteros	61 765 177	25 248 225	36 516 952
Little Cayman	53 382 980	21 032 460	32 350 520
Saint John's	47 199 974	20 597 607	26 602 367
Little Harbour	43 132 860	20 495 271	22 637 589
La Navasse	41 388 990	19 351 197	22 037 793
Santo Domingo	39 030 982	17 641 927	21 389 055
Saint-Louis	35 367 344	19 292 940	16 074 404

 

Edited April 3, 2018 by qw569

[staun]

Nah gold flow in a steady stream in every nation. We are just two players in KDP. We ofc realy on the others to defend oure port, But we have no problem to pay for oure port with a defence timer. Money comes cheap thies days

[staun]

49 minutes ago, Graf Bernadotte said:

How does this work in Danemark-Norge? Do you have a 90% income tax or does every player has to pay a flat of 500k per day?

Both and neither. There is no demand for players to pay. Plenty of players only tax is the 10 % on the port. 

Some feel they can help a bit more. I can ofc not talk for everybody. But in DNP and KDP players help out. The clan need gold ppl give, there is the need for ressources player get it. The return is if players need a ship, there is one for them. Money is not a problem. Both clan have enough gold to pay for the ports for 3 weeks without any income.

[staun]

I like that financering means more in the game. But would like that the 600 k a day gave more than a defence timer. The timer for small Nations are in general useless. If we got in big fight with Russia/Spain we cluldn’t Stop them anyway. 

RvR should be more strategic, and involve finance and logisic even more, But  still have the pb fight at is corr element. Graffi sctuslly had a good idea to start with. Still needed bit in the strategic area. 

I would as an example like that you not could attack any port, But you have to fight your way there. Could be you couldn’t attack s regional Capital, before you had atleast to supporting ports. Maybe how far from your closes port are aviable to attack.

[Jean Ribault]

8 minutes ago, Graf Bernadotte said:

There have been such ideas. And I tried to implement those ideas in my proposal for an integrated game mechanic for RvR, PvP and trade. But Devs are not interested in economy. If they would spend half of the effort they used for sailing profiles into trade mechanic NA would become the best game launched in this decade. But with a non working trade mechanic the game will become a flop, since it destroys RvR and PvP as well.

Well said.  With no working economy, they should just create Legends and be done with it.

[qw569😳]

Statistical Institute of Inagua

Weekly report 02/04/2018-08/04/2018 (prev report)

Revenue by nations

Nation	Tax	Cost	Revenue	Max Captured Ports
Pirates	24 571 754	34 743 787	-10 172 033	20
Danmark-Norge	30 915 563	75 456 698	-44 541 135	28
France	78 034 691	117 112 991	-39 078 300	46
Great Britain	32 078 242	79 535 685	-47 457 443	38
España	35 314 743	52 680 998	-17 366 255	57
United States	28 660 833	41 560 059	-12 899 226	15
Sverige	126 152 902	122 963 268	3 189 634	52
Verenigde Provinciën	14 832 944	41 352 761	-26 519 817	19
Russian Empire	28 781 767	34 360 017	-5 578 250	17
Kingdom of Prussia	33 396 845	33 733 674	- 336 829	19
Commonwealth of Poland	2 518 006	13 100 000	-10 581 994	11

Daily reports are available at this link

 

Revenue by clans (highest revenue)

Clan	Tax	Cost	Revenue
HRE	70 109 161	54 947 778	15 161 383
7UP	10 817 534	5 321 069	5 496 465
HREKK	13 775 807	8 708 260	5 067 547
ALOHA	10 869 203	5 993 887	4 875 316
WTF	6 541 101	3 240 699	3 300 402
SMOKE	5 400 986	3 533 088	1 867 898
VSCO	7 056 641	5 251 486	1 805 155
RSC	11 956 275	10 536 909	1 419 366
TERRS	2 410 832	1 176 205	1 234 627
GOD	4 360 976	3 200 000	1 160 976

Revenue by clans (lowest revenue)

Clan	Tax	Cost	Revenue
DNP	16 778 062	43 281 690	-26 503 628
PERVS	3 810 758	19 750 000	-15 939 242
CBC	16 768 867	31 350 547	-14 581 680
CH	2 043 562	16 590 000	-14 546 438
VCA	2 591 762	12 800 000	-10 208 238
PFK	1 701 782	11 700 000	-9 998 218
SLRN	1 161 602	9 800 000	-8 638 398
VNM	1 427 978	9 615 000	-8 187 022
LIBRE	1 361 835	8 680 000	-7 318 165
FP	1 094 731	8 400 000	-7 305 269

Revenue by ports (highest revenue)

Port	Tax	Cost	Revenue
Cartagena de Indias	20 349 999	6 104 997	14 245 002
Cumaná	16 967 949	4 466 025	12 501 924
Nassau	17 002 355	5 219 275	11 783 080
Esteros	12 678 533	3 883 267	8 795 266
La Navasse	11 823 915	4 229 893	7 594 022
Saint John's	10 701 818	4 438 260	6 263 558
Little Cayman	10 626 992	4 521 069	6 105 923
Puerto de España	12 259 304	6 317 634	5 941 670
Little Harbour	8 906 132	4 275 271	4 630 861
Bridgetown	9 513 733	5 090 547	4 423 186

Weekly report 09/04/2018-15/04/2018

Revenue by nations

Nation	Tax	Cost	Revenue	Max Captured Ports
Pirates	23 133 287	33 985 887	-10 852 600	17
Danmark-Norge	30 452 672	71 927 988	-41 475 316	26
France	76 822 013	120 039 111	-43 217 098	48
Great Britain	37 641 314	83 273 852	-45 632 538	38
España	29 083 227	54 115 581	-25 032 354	56
United States	18 422 676	35 245 000	-16 822 324	14
Sverige	113 607 148	122 631 781	-9 024 633	51
Verenigde Provinciën	17 336 077	28 571 978	-11 235 901	21
Russian Empire	32 520 731	35 149 806	-2 629 075	16
Kingdom of Prussia	34 511 457	32 828 226	1 683 231	21
Commonwealth of Poland	1 503 792	14 700 000	-13 196 208	11

 

Revenue by clans (highest revenue)

Clan	Tax	Cost	Revenue
HRE	72 929 062	56 773 119	16 155 943
ALOHA	10 130 297	6 270 365	3 859 932
7UP	9 259 891	5 670 000	3 589 891
BLANC	12 528 109	9 197 474	3 330 635
WTF	6 542 782	3 305 524	3 237 258
RSC	11 596 634	8 376 819	3 219 815
HREKK	11 731 290	8 540 000	3 191 290
HAVOC	2 985 290	1 308 774	1 676 516
ER	12 993 727	11 691 668	1 302 059
SMOKE	3 709 467	2 610 363	1 099 104

Revenue by clans (lowest revenue)

Clan	Tax	Cost	Revenue
DNP	15 771 826	42 817 988	-27 046 162
CBC	13 646 402	29 110 231	-15 463 829
CH	3 000 432	17 080 000	-14 079 568
PFK	1 129 848	13 300 000	-12 170 152
CABAL	15 395 012	26 740 000	-11 344 988
VCA	3 139 369	12 650 000	-9 510 631
SLRN	852 718	9 800 000	-8 947 282
CORSR	254 955	8 540 000	-8 285 045
ARMED	2 678 567	10 300 000	-7 621 433
FP	906 396	8 400 000	-7 493 604

Revenue by ports (highest revenue)

Port	Tax	Cost	Revenue
Cartagena de Indias	21 267 110	6 513 203	14 753 907
Nassau	14 365 887	4 818 397	9 547 490
Esteros	11 758 598	4 297 474	7 461 124
La Navasse	11 308 127	4 200 000	7 108 127
Puerto de España	12 943 297	6 651 668	6 291 629
Saint John's	10 498 208	4 270 000	6 228 208
Cumaná	9 934 910	4 200 000	5 734 910
Little Cayman	9 175 444	4 270 000	4 905 444
Santo Domingo	8 986 409	4 200 000	4 786 409
Saint-Louis	8 546 459	4 276 819	4 269 640

Edited April 16, 2018 by qw569

[staun]

Well one thing this reports show is that nations with large numbers of uncaptural ports have an advantage. They don't have the need to put timer on there ports, except a few select. Look at a nation like us (DK-NG). But ofc devs have said that we should be a hard nation. Just don't make sence on of the smallest nations should get another handicap. Sometime I think it would be so much easier to be among the few select. 

And no, no need to worry that we can't pay. We are at the moment building funds up, so we can get over the summer, where we might se a decline in numbers. 

In my next life, I want to be a brit.

[staun]

2 minutes ago, rediii said:

your theory sucks because sweden ...

No it don't. Nations that have enough ports that can't be taken have an advantage in how they spend there money on timers. You can try to compensate for it, by getting those port that can generate money, witch the Swedes have been very good at. But to do that and be able to hold on to them you need to be a strong nation.

[Kloothommel]

1 hour ago, rediii said:

your theory sucks because sweden ...

Sweden has multiple ports inside their reinforcementzone. EZ mode.

38 minutes ago, Banished Privateer said:

Prussia is the best-earning nation and most stable economically. 

So that's why you joined them

You winning side joiner, you!

[staun]

6 hours ago, Banished Privateer said:

Jokes are funny only if people laugh (and not just the guy that's telling the joke) . Achieved through the hard work and good planning. 

But  glad to see that Prussia have a good balance, witch once more make me raise my voice abouth a certain trainingsport. Do the honnorable thing😇

Edited April 17, 2018 by staun

[staun]

34 minutes ago, Graf Bernadotte said:

Have a look on all those ports you have a timer on without needing it for production. You wanna keep your core territory safe. That costs. Anyway port economy is broken. Ports don't generate income, when they are used a lot for crafting. But repeating this problem doesn't seem to help. Looks like Devs want to develop the worst economy system in a game ever.

You are right. We try to keep the core territory as safe as possible for the rest of the nation. Think it is important for the  DK-NG  playerbase, Then we have some around the map like Cayman, Misteriosa and San Andres, but thats just because we don't have a big night crew. Think we all know what happens with those ports if there was no timer on. Bf got Maracaibo by the dutch. So if we want fights and not be up at night , it is the price to pay. 

Do the money we spend limits oure actions on other places on the map, I do think so. I like that money matter in the game. I also can understand that the developpers want to proctect real life large nations. most likely there is more game to sell than in little Denmark and Norway. I just hope they evently will try to level the playfield a bit. 

Well I just hope that they in time will see the error in there gameplay(my opinion). Logistic should matter. But it should not be money alone. And in my opinion it should be a more level field.

Edited April 17, 2018 by staun

[staun]

4 minutes ago, Graf Bernadotte said:

Best protection against nightflips is the costs new owners have to pay as well for setting PB timers. No idea why you need to be spread out all over the map though. A small nation doesn't have to play superpower.

We don’t play superpower. Bf is by the dutch, I guess to get some fights. By nippes, most likely because the patrol area. Danve have a couple og ports a bit away. But i think they want to keep them.

what ports do Dnp have that make us a superpower. San andres, took er s long time ago, to get some fights with the britts. Cayman to get fight against Spain and Russia. Guiama Servilla, we hope every day some one will take of oure hand. Then er have oure tainings pb, witch the Prussian not have taken back. Ports to get content, But not close to corr territorium of any nation.  

[staun]

24 minutes ago, rediii said:

San Andres - totally useless port you have a timer on for the dot

Other than that you are the only nation that puts timers on every port you own a bit closer to the capital.

But anyway its no problem for denmark.

 

Yeah we still can pay. We put on Those close to CS. The rest as a San Andreas is so we can’t be night flipped. We like the fight, But even more we like oure beauty sleep. Just see how many ports that was lost to the Dutch without a fight, because of no timer.

[staun]

3 minutes ago, rediii said:

not even sweden has timers on all the ports in or outside the safezone and it doesnt have a nightcrew aswell.

Sweden has timers on important woodports, ports that finance themselve and important ports to have a foothold somewhere and nothing else. I know that because I made the plan for it which port should have a timer and which one doesnt.

You complain because you do it wrong. Its not the fault of the game, only your fault

Thought you was Dutch. But I get it. If you come with a surgestion on gameplay, it is for the best of the game, But if I do it, it is to complain and because I don’t have any skills and can’t find out to play the game.