Guest Posted October 27, 2017 Posted October 27, 2017 (edited) Nice, especially considering that 8 of the pirate ships weren't even Wasas. And the 47 minute mark is like an old painting of a fleet clash, beautiful. Edited October 27, 2017 by Guest
Jack Jones Posted October 27, 2017 Posted October 27, 2017 And the Connies were not live oak white oak but Bermuda/teak. 😁
Kloothommel Posted October 27, 2017 Posted October 27, 2017 1 hour ago, rediii said: Christendom sailing with the hated danes, russians bernadotte, anolytic and babay he wanted to nightflip away from the server. I can't believe what I see there. @Cornelis Tromp are you disussing merge now in the ts aswell? We look past old enemies. I invited chris myself. 1
Thonys Posted October 27, 2017 Posted October 27, 2017 (edited) 25 wasa flipped (over) at the port now she has her revenge! Edited October 27, 2017 by Thonys
Kloothommel Posted October 27, 2017 Posted October 27, 2017 6 minutes ago, rediii said: maybe @Lord Vicious can lead the russian empire to victory? We already joked about that 😂 1
monk33y Posted October 27, 2017 Author Posted October 27, 2017 Everyone looses sometime... Didn't the Sverige loose to the French recently!! Who cares about Wasa being lost, you replace them in 2 hrs... Hardly ground breaking stuff 2
Hawkwood Posted October 27, 2017 Posted October 27, 2017 13 hours ago, Christendom said: Russia vs Pirates - Atwood - Pirates Won Not the best showing from mighty Russia. Fireships firmly trashed our ranks as we allowed ourselves to be pinned close to land sailing in lines and then as we sailed to take the bottom circle downwind even more fireships came in and blew up half a dozen of us that couldn't maneuver in that confined circle. Overall I think our guys individually played well, but tactically giving up the wind and getting trapped in the bottom most circle against land was not the best move. Fun fight though and I was cracking up sailing around the hulks of blown up ships most of the battle. GF pirates. Another lost battle of the new empire with old players which came from different factions.Russians/"Danes" aren´t anymore what they used to be, FEARED. New empire to be considered as random, nothing special about them. Such a shame
Christendom Posted October 27, 2017 Posted October 27, 2017 19 minutes ago, Cortez said: Another lost battle of the new empire with old players which came from different factions.Russians/"Danes" aren´t anymore what they used to be, FEARED. New empire to be considered as random, nothing special about them. Such a shame One might add that at least they used to be able to say they had the most “feared” fleet on the server. I think Spain’s reputation was such that the nicest thing you could say about them was... “Sometimes they show up”. I enjoyed the PB . We lost Life goes on 1
monk33y Posted October 27, 2017 Author Posted October 27, 2017 I lWe lost, we will go back to the classroom. Study the battle, highlight areas of improvement. Learn and come back again... Harder.... We have learnt that certain past 'friends' have gone... Watch this space... I remember in the early day of the Sverige nation they were whipping boys in pb.. They improved alot. The Russians are coming.... 1
Christendom Posted October 27, 2017 Posted October 27, 2017 4 hours ago, rediii said: Christendom sailing with the hated danes, russians bernadotte, anolytic and babay he wanted to nightflip away from the server. I can't believe what I see there. @Cornelis Tromp are you disussing merge now in the ts aswell? I’m slowly teaching them the ways of the night flip. 1
sveno Posted October 28, 2017 Posted October 28, 2017 (edited) Battle Swedes vs Russians @ Grand Turk Commanders (subcommanders): Swedes: @rediii (Havelock , sveno) Russians: @BABAY (NorthViking?) Result screen (Swedish victory): Recordings: Swedish PoV (by redii): Russian PoV (by Babay): An interesting note, two very different fleet compositions were fighting in this battle. The Swedes had lighter ships, mainly Victories, the Russians had mainly very heavy Oceans. The battle was fierce, in the end the Swedes killed more ships but had less combined HP then the remaining Russians. Looking forward for the next fight against the Russian bears. o7 Edited October 29, 2017 by sveno 6
randommexi Posted October 29, 2017 Posted October 29, 2017 (edited) Damn it Russia, what are you doing!! GRRRR need to beat those swedes! Edited October 29, 2017 by randommexi
Wilson09 Posted October 29, 2017 Posted October 29, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, randommexi said: Damn it Russia, what are you doing!! GRRRR need to beat those swedes! text as follows (below) A Strategist Russian Bear: "Running away? Not a bit of it. I´m luring ´em on." Edited October 29, 2017 by Wilson09
Palatinose Posted October 29, 2017 Posted October 29, 2017 Might be the climate played a role these days. No harsh winters in the carribean though...
staun Posted October 29, 2017 Posted October 29, 2017 Well I do worry a bit for Denmark Norway. The latest battle do surgest that the only nation that Russia can beat is us. Guess when they are tirred of getting beat up, they will turn to us for a confident boost. Time for us get to sea and get in shape.
staun Posted October 29, 2017 Posted October 29, 2017 Not only. We still have a lot to master. But after evry battle we try to find 1-2 things to do better in next battle
Guest Posted October 29, 2017 Posted October 29, 2017 3 minutes ago, Graf Bernadotte said: And after this is done next week you will defeat us in Bermuda. Nobody has to fear the Russian bear. It's a pet ... Well it's a nice pet for the pelts...
monk33y Posted October 30, 2017 Author Posted October 30, 2017 Wasn't online what port fell this time??
sveno Posted October 30, 2017 Posted October 30, 2017 (edited) Battle Swedes vs French @ Grand Anse Commanders (Subcommanders): Swedes: redii (sveno) French: unknown Result screen (Swedish victory) First portbattle of the Swedes with the new BR limitation (5100). Thanks to the French turning up with full BR, GG WP o7. Edited October 31, 2017 by sveno 2
Christendom Posted October 30, 2017 Posted October 30, 2017 36 minutes ago, rediii said: just imagine it with the last attack of russia vs sweden. ~40 1st rates of russia went inside the region and a huge 1st rate battle erupted. Let's say russia would have won the battle and set the portbattle. after 2 huge battles with ~40 1st rates more or less on both sides and huge preperation needed etc. a portbattle is created. 3000 BR possible. equal to 5 1st rates. Now the next big battle will be outside the portbattle if you get enough players together to field the swedish screening force of ~15 1st rates and several smaller taggingships. The outcome will be not important. only that 3000 BR battle is important. To attack 3000 BR ports you need to have a lot of screening on a server that isn't on a low population. If the enemy doesnt screen the PB ... well gratulation 25 screeners just wasted ~2 hours. more people involved in a PB than just the 25 going in isn't a bad thing. 2
Lord Vicious Posted October 30, 2017 Posted October 30, 2017 1 minute ago, Christendom said: more people involved in a PB than just the 25 going in isn't a bad thing. tbh i told them to make the raid for pb, for avoid screening since 2 years as well do the br system, but i also told them to remove slots limitations or raise it to 30, and to put fixed BR, not random br on every port. something like 6500 for normal ones, 12k for capital ones, and dunno for shallow, 2000?
Christendom Posted October 30, 2017 Posted October 30, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Lord Vicious said: tbh i told them to make the raid for pb, for avoid screening since 2 years as well do the br system, but i also told them to remove slots limitations or raise it to 30, and to put fixed BR, not random br on every port. something like 6500 for normal ones, 12k for capital ones, and dunno for shallow, 2000? the BR is similar to that in game, though some ports just are not tuned correctly. 1700 BR for atwood (deep 4th) 3400 for west end (shallow). Doesn't make sense. I like the BR system, but I think the circles EITHER need to be BR based OR there needs to be a minimum type of ship. For example a 1st rate battle should have a min of say 10 1st rates, this would prevent trolling in 25 lynxs or Princes. I personally like the role of screening/counter screening. Not everyone can get in a PB and screening provides those and new players with some form of content and "near PB" experiences. It also makes planning when and where to strike a bit more tactical. I feel like some people just want a port battle simulator game where they queue up with their cookie cutter 25 vics or wasa's, fight and log off. Games like that exist already. NA should be about the OW. Edited October 30, 2017 by Christendom 5
Lord Vicious Posted November 1, 2017 Posted November 1, 2017 (edited) On 31/10/2017 at 12:45 AM, Christendom said: the BR is similar to that in game, though some ports just are not tuned correctly. 1700 BR for atwood (deep 4th) 3400 for west end (shallow). Doesn't make sense. I like the BR system, but I think the circles EITHER need to be BR based OR there needs to be a minimum type of ship. For example a 1st rate battle should have a min of say 10 1st rates, this would prevent trolling in 25 lynxs or Princes. I personally like the role of screening/counter screening. Not everyone can get in a PB and screening provides those and new players with some form of content and "near PB" experiences. It also makes planning when and where to strike a bit more tactical. I feel like some people just want a port battle simulator game where they queue up with their cookie cutter 25 vics or wasa's, fight and log off. Games like that exist already. NA should be about the OW. With a br system circle have no more reason to exist unless they are BR based instead ship/numbers, since it not have sense that a frig can block a circle to be captured from a firstrate also Br for ships need to be better re-evaluated like 4th rates have too low br compared to their performance Edited November 1, 2017 by Lord Vicious 4
Recommended Posts