Bach Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 Following CCCP clan violating the spirit and intent of the French and Danish trade alliance The Purge clan French have engaged in defensive fighting to recover the lost regions of Basse Terre and Grande Terre. Danish ships will be attacked in open waters until hostilities cease. 5
Bach Posted June 23, 2017 Author Posted June 23, 2017 Who attacked the Allies first? The French attacked allies first, and we never attacked the French tread By flipping Bridgetown in early time to deny CM marks to North American French, by secret deal, CCCP attacked first. 3
Barbancourt Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 (edited) At this moment in Occupied France: -Danes bully and curse our French elders in their coarse gutteral language, pelting them with Danish Pickled Herrings! -Danes swill themselves drunk on our Burgundian Wines and soil our proud French boulevards! -Danes tax our French families to decorate the livestock sheds of Christiansted with Versailles Terracottas! -Danes fly their bloody banner over our cultured French children! -Danes pilfer our beautiful Parisian Furnitures and gift them to their goonish Swedish thugs! - ...and worst of all - those dirty dirty Danes - they openly leer at our fine French women! Edited June 23, 2017 by Barbancourt (rownd) 7
Captain Jean-Luc Picard Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 2 hours ago, WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot said: Ooooh! now i can eat my popcorn! 1
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 11 minutes ago, Captain Jean-Luc Picard said: JEEEZ!! I was only watching and eating popcorn! what did I do?!? LoL 2
as24862486 Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 (edited) 4 hours ago, Bach said: Who attacked the Allies first? The French attacked allies first, and we never attacked the French tread By flipping Bridgetown in early time to deny CM marks to North American French, by secret deal, CCCP attacked first. Gen bridgetown hostilly too much when the last one leave battle. The PB is active. If you want back, we can gen hoatilly again. Keep lie youself and your nation, keep make your fake news Now we're not deals anymore Edited June 23, 2017 by as24862486
Barbancourt Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, as24862486 said: Now we're not deals anymore Your "deal" was taking half of our ports. Not a good "deal". 1
Dharus Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 6 minutes ago, as24862486 said: Gen bridgetown hostilly too much when the last one leave battle. The PB is active. If you want back, we can gen hoatilly again. Keep lie youself and your nation, keep make your fake news Now we're not deals anymore Not fake news when the clan you're talking to leaks the plan. Sure maybe not exactly the right time but the intent to appease one clan of France. You're right, no more "deals".
as24862486 Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 Just now, Barbancourt (rownd) said: Your "deal" was taking half of our ports. Not a good "deal". If we're not take that port. France are not fight daines?! No, you guys still want a fight.
Barbancourt Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 (edited) Most of us just want Basse-Terre and Grande-Terre back. Oh...and stop leering at our women! ;D Edited June 23, 2017 by Barbancourt (rownd)
Arsilon Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 If Denmark had given France Grand/Basse Terre back like was the original promise, no there would be no conflict right now. If your ICS lackies had actually told you what we wanted. You would know our position as we have been pretty clear from the get go on what it has been. If your ICS lackies had not told you not to talk to Teutonic you would also know what we wanted since Teutonic tried to tell you guys repeatedly what the issue was and to resolve it. The big issue was and still is in Denmark's occupation of Basse/Grand Terre. The response was both counties were needed to reduce your sail time farther south. I don't know why you need BOTH of those counties for that purpose...but be that as it may. Our next question was if you did indeed need them 'temporarily' when we would get them back? The response was when diplomacy is put back in the game. Which is the same as saying never. Then you flip a port in a different time slot 'by accident' when ICS admitted in their own TS that it was done to allow them to get more of their people into the battle (they did not realize there were others in the room and quickly booted them from the server as soon as the slip was made). Teutonic even reached out to you one final time before France resumed hostilities in a last ditch attempt to resolve but we were rebuffed. And even now we hear Denmark is offering to pay ICS CM's to stay out of the fight. You want France to get along with ICS but you and they make that impossible.
Barbancourt Posted June 23, 2017 Posted June 23, 2017 (edited) Personally I thought we were going to give it another week or so to make progress, but some are not so patient. :/ I'm just one sailor, though. Edited June 23, 2017 by Barbancourt (rownd)
as24862486 Posted June 24, 2017 Posted June 24, 2017 13 minutes ago, Dharus said: Not fake news when the clan you're talking to leaks the plan. Sure maybe not exactly the right time but the intent to appease one clan of France. You're right, no more "deals". Chinese Summer’s coming No more "deals" with France. 5 minutes ago, Arsilon said: If Denmark had given France Grand/Basse Terre back like was the original promise, no there would be no conflict right now. If your ICS lackies had actually told you what we wanted. You would know our position as we have been pretty clear from the get go on what it has been. If your ICS lackies had not told you not to talk to Teutonic you would also know what we wanted since Teutonic tried to tell you guys repeatedly what the issue was and to resolve it. The big issue was and still is in Denmark's occupation of Basse/Grand Terre. The response was both counties were needed to reduce your sail time farther south. I don't know why you need BOTH of those counties for that purpose...but be that as it may. Our next question was if you did indeed need them 'temporarily' when we would get them back? The response was when diplomacy is put back in the game. Which is the same as saying never. Then you flip a port in a different time slot 'by accident' when ICS admitted in their own TS that it was done to allow them to get more of their people into the battle (they did not realize there were others in the room and quickly booted them from the server as soon as the slip was made). Teutonic even reached out to you one final time before France resumed hostilities in a last ditch attempt to resolve but we were rebuffed. And even now we hear Denmark is offering to pay ICS CM's to stay out of the fight. You want France to get along with ICS but you and they make that impossible. Your question didnt request ours officer When will france can take back. Does any PURGE content us?! Complain what you feel?! We're watting ROE system back then vote together. To be real alliance, France can build any resources in danmark port. Why we want Basse/Grand terre?! Its a nice location when ROE is back. We can quickly to defend france port whos attack France. But now is failed.
Slamz Posted June 24, 2017 Posted June 24, 2017 2 minutes ago, as24862486 said: Why we want Basse/Grand terre?! When we have those back, war is over. Until then, CCCP ships will be relocated to the bottom of the ocean. You will not safely trade while we are online. CCCP is a dishonorable clan. Nobody should make deals with you. ICS was foolish to do so. We will not make their mistakes. 2
Random Posted June 24, 2017 Posted June 24, 2017 3 minutes ago, as24862486 said: We can quickly to defend france port whos attack France. From whom would you defend France from Basse/Grand Terre? That location makes little strategic sense and two regions are definitely not required for "defending France". Sounds like a bunch of hastily produced bull to me... 2
Bach Posted June 24, 2017 Author Posted June 24, 2017 57 minutes ago, as24862486 said: Gen bridgetown hostilly too much when the last one leave battle. The PB is active. If you want back, we can gen hoatilly again. Keep lie youself and your nation, keep make your fake news Now we're not deals anymore Gen hostility or not the mistake was still yours. You offered not remedy for lost CMs. We want Grand Terre and Basse-Terre back without waiting for Dev rules change. You stay north of Saint John we have peace.
Barbancourt Posted June 24, 2017 Posted June 24, 2017 7 minutes ago, as24862486 said: We're watting ROE system back then vote together. To be real alliance, France can build any resources in danmark port. Why we want Basse/Grand terre?! Its a nice location when ROE is back. We can quickly to defend france port whos attack France. We are supposed to accept Occupation until a "ROE system" that may or may not happen months from now? 1
Slamz Posted June 24, 2017 Posted June 24, 2017 5 minutes ago, Drunken Spelunking said: From whom would you defend France from Basse/Grand Terre? That location makes little strategic sense and two regions are definitely not required for "defending France". Sounds like a bunch of hastily produced bull to me... Maybe he has a good idea here. We will take the Virgin Islands to better defend Denmark. 2
Random Posted June 24, 2017 Posted June 24, 2017 2 minutes ago, Slamz said: Maybe he has a good idea here. We will take the Virgin Islands to better defend Denmark. In case zee Germans come...
Teutonic Posted June 24, 2017 Posted June 24, 2017 3 hours ago, Drunken Spelunking said: From whom would you defend France from Basse/Grand Terre? That location makes little strategic sense and two regions are definitely not required for "defending France". Sounds like a bunch of hastily produced bull to me... I don't think we ever asked for this defense either?
Recommended Posts