Hethwill, the Red Duke Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 Let's drop the inter clan subject please. Carry on with the thread subject and purpose, whatever it may be. 1
Guest Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 Just now, Lord Vicious said: easy to lead 3 ppl call me when ocean will reach 170 members and take ports and nations on their own k? Has there even been more than 3 Toxic members in a PB yet? Can't recall seeing it. And as for 170 members, it was 180 the last time you pulled out the 'fake strength with lots of inactive players' card
TommyShelby Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, Lord Vicious said: easy to lead 3 ppl call me when ocean will reach 170 members and take ports and nations on their own k? Call me when we give a shit about reaching 170 members and taking ports and nations on our own, k? 14
Lord Vicious Posted February 15, 2017 Author Posted February 15, 2017 1 minute ago, Hethwill said: Let's drop the inter clan subject please. Carry on with the thread subject and purpose, whatever it may be. It was a genuine troll now is, who lied? john swiglebottoms/sweden or brit leaders ?
Lord Vicious Posted February 15, 2017 Author Posted February 15, 2017 Just now, TommyShelby said: Call me when we give a shit about reaching 170 members and taking ports and nations on our own, k? The moment you told me you wanna grow to do that in steam? you now steam have chat history right?
Guest Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, Lord Vicious said: who lied? john swiglebottoms/sweden or brit leaders ? I believe no one is interested in this except you
TommyShelby Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 I don't know if your memory is bad but our purpose never were to reach 200 members, nor was our purpose to have a full OCEAN fleet doing PB's. That said, it would be cool. But it is not, never was, and never will be, a goal for us. We simply aim to have highly skilled players that we like playing with, if we have 5 or 200 members doesn't matter to us. Though, i welcome you to check our steam chat history 1
Hethwill, the Red Duke Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 3 minutes ago, Lord Vicious said: It was a genuine troll now is, who lied? john swiglebottoms/sweden or brit leaders ? I don't care. Carry on with the subject announced in the thread please. And that's meant to everyone posting. Building a fire on purpose just for the sake of watching a thread burn ? Nah.
Lord Vicious Posted February 15, 2017 Author Posted February 15, 2017 3 minutes ago, Aegir said: Has there even been more than 3 Toxic members in a PB yet? Can't recall seeing it. And as for 170 members, it was 180 the last time you pulled out the 'fake strength with lots of inactive players' card we have an average of 5-8 in all PB wich is double then OCean average since they exist. When ocean where still 5 we where filling full fleets around brit , my point is if ocean have better leadership how they never grown to be rilevant? is easy to lead a 15man clan, bit harder to grow one with 40 ppl in ts3 and 176 members when game pop was 1500-2000. this is about a month ago so prrrrrrrrrrrr
Lord Vicious Posted February 15, 2017 Author Posted February 15, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Hethwill said: I don't care. Carry on with the subject announced in the thread please. And that's meant to everyone posting. Building a fire on purpose just for the sake of watching a thread burn ? Nah. Go with your biased moderation elsewhere thx heatwhill you not even have the decency to note that i didnt bring up the question it come up naturally when redii confirmed he not was a diplo ps: fix your caronades they still load double balls , you not have a thread made by devs to knight around? Also where is writed that this thread cant talk about a different matter from wich it started? i made it and i am fine if go other directions Edited February 15, 2017 by Lord Vicious
TommyShelby Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 Just now, Lord Vicious said: my point is if ocean have better leadership how they never grown to be rilevant? I mean, i don't claim we have better leadership. But as i stated to you a hundred times, our goal isn't to have 200 members and be "relevant". Now i have a serious question. Why do you feel the need to bring OCEAN into every discussion you take part in? Why are you mentioning our clan all the time if we are irrelevant?
Hethwill, the Red Duke Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 Yes. Not open to a debate. Back to the thread subject number 3.
Lord Vicious Posted February 15, 2017 Author Posted February 15, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, TommyShelby said: I mean, i don't claim we have better leadership. But as i stated to you a hundred times, our goal isn't to have 200 members and be "relevant". Now i have a serious question. Why do you feel the need to bring OCEAN into every discussion you take part in? Why are you mentioning our clan all the time if we are irrelevant? I didnt start it you seams to suffer of same attention deficiency of heatwhill. ps: did you called him for lock the thread as soon things go bad for you? Edited February 15, 2017 by Lord Vicious
Hethwill, the Red Duke Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 Thread has run its course. This is not "light pvp" and for sure not national news. It is nothing. 4
Recommended Posts