max_86 Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 Nvidia GTX 460 (with factory overclock) 3 GB RAM (don't ask my why) I run NA on High at around 30 fps. Not bad, since my system is not the best and the game isn't optimized yet. 1
Megiddo Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Desktop PC Specs:Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti <<< (Just bought this to overcome the shader 4 vs.5 issue)MB: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Model EP43-UD3LRAM: 8.00 GB RAM64-bit operating systemProcessor: Intel® Core2 Duo CPU E8600 @ 3.33GHz Number of processor cores 2 I'm playing 1920x1080 on medium (going to high afer seeing Max_86) and everything is smooth, but only playing PVE on light ships till I figure this out a bit. So far it's really nice!!!!
Grim DeGrim Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Runs on ultra (1920x1080), averages 33 fps, down to 25 fps when in large battles. System: Intel Core i7-5820K Haswell-E 6-Core 3.3GHz 2x Nvidia gtx 570 (sli) 8gb Ram
Dark Order Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Can i run this game with an Intel HD Graphics Card? (Not Intel HD 4000, just Intel HD...) I know the card is bs, but i can play WoT on the lowest settings (rendering 50%)
ParaBellum Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 To my knowledge the Intel HD card only supports DX 10, and you need a DX 11 capable card to play Naval Action.
kershy Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Will I be able to run it on anything more then low? Amd-FX 4100 8gb RAM Gtx 650 Win.7 I was able to run the game on ultra at a stable 25 fps but I run it on high at 50 fps.
MacHopper Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 Ok so I've read through this thread and I checked out the wikipedia list of graphics cards that the "A short guide for novices" linked to, but I'm unsure about something. The list seemed to indicate that my Graphics card could manage DivX 10 only, but earlier in this thread someone posted that they needed DivX 11 for Warthunder and I play that...soooo...somewhat unsure here.My system is:Intel Core 2 quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83 GHz4 GB RAMATI Radeon HD 4600 SeriesNow I'm not even going to ask about top-end quality, I know the (almost guaranteed certain) answer there, but am I in with a shout for low/med graphics with "decent" performance?
Prater Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 Ok so I've read through this thread and I checked out the wikipedia list of graphics cards that the "A short guide for novices" linked to, but I'm unsure about something. The list seemed to indicate that my Graphics card could manage DivX 10 only, but earlier in this thread someone posted that they needed DivX 11 for Warthunder and I play that...soooo...somewhat unsure here. My system is: Intel Core 2 quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83 GHz 4 GB RAM ATI Radeon HD 4600 Series Now I'm not even going to ask about top-end quality, I know the (almost guaranteed certain) answer there, but am I in with a shout for low/med graphics with "decent" performance? Sorry, you won't be able to run the game. It requires dx11 and your card doesn't support it.
DanielCoffey Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 The GT 635M is a VERY weak, low power mobile card with performance of only a couple of percentage points when compared to current desktop cards. If the AA and shadows are already off, there is little else you can do except make sure all other processes on the machine are off while playing.
DanielCoffey Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 Oh, my apologies then. Skyrim on High? Wow. I made my assumption on the GPU performance websites that show scores in the 700-900 range (725 for the 635M) where desktop GPUs were scoring in the 5000-10000 range It is good to know that with the correct settings it can still be used.
Bigepiploon2 Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 Intel G3258 @4.3 Ram 2x4 Gb 1600 Sapphire r9 270x 2 Gb I'm running NA in high at 55/60 FPS
MacHopper Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 Sorry, you won't be able to run the game. It requires dx11 and your card doesn't support it. Guess there's a new Graphics card in my future lol.
Megiddo Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 Guess there's a new Graphics card in my future lol. I did... and I've got my PC to it's limits. No upgrades are available now (I've done CPU/Memory). The next purchase will be a whole new PC. I got a: Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti <-- Bought for this game MB: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Model EP43-UD3L RAM: 8.00 GB RAM 64-bit operating system Processor: Intel® Core2 Duo CPU E8600 @ 3.33GHz And I'm getting 40 FPS running on High quality
Saliddry Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 will this work with an saphire radeon HD 7750 ultimate and an fx6300 6 core cpu? more than an buggy slideshow?
Henry d'Esterre Darby Posted January 23, 2015 Posted January 23, 2015 will this work with an saphire radeon HD 7750 ultimate and an fx6300 6 core cpu? more than an buggy slideshow? Your video card seems to support DirectX 11, which is usually the main limitation on being able to run the game. I play on a fairly old Latitude laptop and get 20-30fps on Low, which looks great as far as I'm concerned, so you can run it, and you should have a good gaming experience. I don't have any experience with Radeon though, I'm on an NVidia card, so take my words with a grain of salt sir.
Aussie_Fox Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 \ OTMatt, im getting 55-80 fps on medium settings on 660ti. Im guessin youll be fine. i have a 660Ti as well. great card. averaging about 55-60 on high settings. 50 with shadowplay running.
Mass Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Recomended 760? jesus i only have 670, wow my computer is tragic now...
Aussie_Fox Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 Recomended 760? jesus i only have 670, wow my computer is tragic now... i know the feeling. by the end of this year anyone who has got a pc older than 12 months will need an upgrade. and here i am sitting on a pc thats 5 years old, coming up on 6 *welp* 1
Elysion Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 With a 760 im getting 80 fps on high settings, and 40 fps on ultra
Austrum Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 I did... and I've got my PC to it's limits. No upgrades are available now (I've done CPU/Memory). The next purchase will be a whole new PC. I got a: Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti <-- Bought for this game MB: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Model EP43-UD3L RAM: 8.00 GB RAM 64-bit operating system Processor: Intel® Core2 Duo CPU E8600 @ 3.33GHz And I'm getting 40 FPS running on High quality Yeah it seems a Nvidia GTX 650 Ti boost is more than adequate for this game. Get 45 or so FPS on High Quality and can run Ultra at around 25-35 fps if I really want to.
Justme Posted April 19, 2015 Posted April 19, 2015 Looking at this thread I have a bad feeling I can't afford a PC to run this game
Mauler Posted April 19, 2015 Posted April 19, 2015 Looking at this thread I have a bad feeling I can't afford a PC to run this game Don't be. I used to run a 780ti upgraded from two 580s, well, the 780 died didn't it - and I'm still looking for the receipt, dohhh! The point is I only put one 580 back in and guess what? It works beautifully No stutters or pauses and still get good reflections on the water and detailed ships! Running at - 2560X1440 at Medium settings. Going for FPS numbers not really relevant to this slower paced game - it's not a twitch shooter For what it's worth. Have at it! S! or as I've seen in game, o7 Mauler. P.S. Still looking for that damned receipt!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now