jointventure Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 so only alts are the problem wow, so friendly player WTF guy doing hosti, joinend by BF to raise a port is fair play, nice catch admin
jointventure Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 reverse wasnt the first to do it. Cornelis made a post and a F11, than reverse saw it and use it 2
Black veil Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 that's just laughable, someone post's the bug, fault and then a player admin looks too exploits it , absolutely awesome ;-(
Sir Loorkon Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 16 minutes ago, Liberalism said: Nice, so since only the alts are the problem, I will ask 10 of my friends from the US that are no alts to help me with hostility on US ports All nice and legal. You say there is no drama, but all of this just reminds me of drama with RvR mechanics a year ago when 25 people had to be demoted and week later the mechanic was announced 100% legal. Why do you mix up things here? And why do you misquote me on purpose that I intended to say only ALTs are a promlem? Of course there should be a change to avoid "friends" doing the same thing ALTs could do. Admin posted a solution to that in the other thread just some hours ago.
Dibbler (Retired) Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 30 minutes ago, Black veil said: that's just laughable, someone post's the bug, fault and then a player admin looks too exploits it , absolutely awesome ;-( It is test phase so not a big thing, but still no wonder game pop is smaller than Donald Trumps penis. 1
Angus MacDuff Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Dibbler said: It is test phase so not a big thing, but still no wonder game pop is smaller than Donald Trumps penis. You're right about the testing (I will not comment on the other). This can be easily fixed if Devs take immediate action and we can move on. Edited April 30, 2019 by Angus MacDuff
Dibbler (Retired) Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 (edited) 21 hours ago, Angus MacDuff said: You're right about the testing (I will not comment on the other). This can be easily fixed if Devs take immediate action and we can move on. Nothing will happen, no point in pushing subject. Is testing, everything will be wiped anyway. Edited May 1, 2019 by Dibbler
Socialism Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 (edited) Could you imagine what would have happened if LV or Banished did what Reverse pulled yesterday and streamed it live? Would be an admin led public execution here on the forums. But since it's the golden boy....nothing happens. Only those that are critical get punished. Edited April 30, 2019 by Socialism 11
shunt Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, Socialism said: Could you imagine what would have happened if LV or Banished did what Reverse pulled yesterday and streamed it live? Would be a admin led public execution here on the forums. But since it's the golden boy....nothing happens. Only those that are critical get punished. well after the xp at release drama ... and the subsequent fall out lets see what they do ... im guessing that a lot of players motivation to carry on playing will depend on the result do they follow their own rules or change them yet again ?? 4
Black veil Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Dibbler said: It is test phase so not a big thing, but still no wonder game pop is smaller than Donald Trumps penis. So so true
Black veil Posted April 30, 2019 Posted April 30, 2019 58 minutes ago, Socialism said: Could you imagine what would have happened if LV or Banished did what Reverse pulled yesterday and streamed it live? Would be a admin led public execution here on the forums. But since it's the golden boy....nothing happens. Only those that are critical get punished. Sad truth is ur so right and until admin addresses there so called golden children, we all just have to deal with it or quit or better still pray that release is successful 1
Sir Loorkon Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 ...St. Mateo PB just happened. What is the consequence?
Dibbler (Retired) Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Sir Loorkon said: ...St. Mateo PB just happened. What is the consequence? Does it really matter, will all be wiped again lol. I find all this really amusing now, all the chest beating for taking ports against AI and using bugs, all the saltiness. It's been hillarious watching grown men act like 5 year olds, I seriously think this all could be a good base for a psychological study. Sure i get pissed off also but just go play other stuff for a bit, go out see friends, chat up women in hope of a sexual encounter etc. .... lets all get some perspective on how sad all this has become 🤣😂🤣. Choose life! Edited May 1, 2019 by Dibbler 3
Atreides Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 17 hours ago, Socialism said: Could you imagine what would have happened if LV or Banished did what Reverse pulled yesterday and streamed it live? Would be an admin led public execution here on the forums. But since it's the golden boy....nothing happens. Only those that are critical get punished. Maybe they will dock his twitch payment 10% this week 1
Rob4eg Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 21 hours ago, Sir "The Lorax" John said: There are now two other nations with ports on the US coast that have not been taken using the frontlines system. the front line is with another nation and another clan. but she IS. what is the problem? what's the difference with whom to fight?
Rook29 Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 So after all this talk about being banned if you use this exploit, French clan WO goes and flips Jeremie using the same loop hole tactic. this is a joke because you cannot stop hostilities as easily as you used to.
GIBZ Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) well, the new front line system and the 2 big nation just close 80% of the map for me, what the WO and others nation did is a maybe questionable but just made the game still worth playing for me since it will give me access to PvP at KPR and CharlesTown. If the Devs had change LA NAVASSE and another one in Florida to free-town, like we(the frogs) have in front or FR, the problem had never occur. Edited May 1, 2019 by Ptigibus typos 1
Genevieve Malfleurs Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 4 hours ago, Dibbler said: Does it really matter, will all be wiped again lol. I find all this really amusing now, all the chest beating for taking ports against AI and using bugs, all the saltiness. It's been hillarious watching grown men act like 5 year olds, I seriously think this all could be a good base for a psychological study. Sure i get pissed off also but just go play other stuff for a bit, go out see friends, chat up women in hope of a sexual encounter etc. .... lets all get some perspective on how sad all this has become 🤣😂🤣. Choose life! sexual encounters aren't as good after the last wipe 😂 1
Angus MacDuff Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 4 minutes ago, Genevieve Malfleurs said: sexual encounters aren't as good after the last wipe 😂 Obviously playing the game wrong 1
Dibbler (Retired) Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) Violation of Rule 16 removed. - H. Darby Edited May 1, 2019 by Henry d'Esterre Darby
Black veil Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 13 minutes ago, Sir "The Lorax" John said: Thank you all for offering your opinions - of course, it will be wiped in some weeks' time. This is not the problem. The problem is that people have broken the rules of the developers - these rules must be enforced - the coming wipe is of no consequence in the face of the rules of this game. I completely agree with u but track record says nothing will happen 1
Steele OooOoOOoOOOooooOOOO Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 On 10/21/2016 at 4:29 PM, admin said: edited the post to resonate with wider audience. -------------------------------------------------------
Dibbler (Retired) Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Sir "The Lorax" John said: I cannot quote H. Darby in any topic but this, it seems, so We keep making new topics because there has been no concrete developer response and the problem is just getting worse. I have to admit this is now becoming just another way to create toxicity and unrequired drama by the offenders. Devs should act in some way, otherwise this kind of situation will become "the norm". I have seen many good games destroyed by unruly/toxic community, and conversly many sub par games still running due to a good community. All that trolling/griefing continuing will do is create yet another barrier to game sales and server pop issues. I've seen reviews on steam that point out "toxic community yadyadayada", thats not good for game as a whole. People should really think about if they want game to succeed or just to use to stroke personal egos and move onto next game when game closes. Lets face it with current pop we are kinda on life support currently, and if new wave of players doesn't arrive on release i think will possibly be a terminal situation for game which would be a great shame. Edited May 1, 2019 by Dibbler 3
--Privateer-- Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 9 minutes ago, Sir "The Lorax" John said: As I say, three US ports have been taken using illegal methods. Two Neutral ports have been taken and a third set, but not taken. 12 minutes ago, Sir "The Lorax" John said: If the developers are rolling out punishments as described in the rules, I would be happier. You dug up an old rule that doesn't even apply to this situation. This was written in late 2016, there were no hostility missions, hostility was generated through OW fleets and PVP only. For the period of testing until release using alts to generating hostility is a bannable offence. When it says "using alts to generate hostility" that is referring to sinking alts in the OW in place of OW AI fleets to put hostility on a port. Which isn't applicable at all to the current situation. Now can we please stop creating new threads about the same stuff and actually give the devs a chance to make a decision about it?
Dibbler (Retired) Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 1 minute ago, --Privateer-- said: Two Neutral ports have been taken and a third set, but not taken. You dug up an old rule that doesn't even apply to this situation. This was written in late 2016, there were no hostility missions, hostility was generated through OW fleets and PVP only. For the period of testing until release using alts to generating hostility is a bannable offence. When it says "using alts to generate hostility" that is referring to sinking alts in the OW in place of OW AI fleets to put hostility on a port. Which isn't applicable at all to the current situation. Now can we please stop creating new threads about the same stuff and actually give the devs a chance to make a decision about it? Ahah! The OJ Simpson defence . 1
Recommended Posts