Klaus Stoertebecker Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 Just want to here what the Devs thinking about this: - If a Port gets taken, it will be handed back on the next day without defense It´s from this Thread Isnt that abusing Game Mechanics? I mean free PB loot by taken a Port without defense. Not that the Nation is able to defend its a agrement between them. So i just would like to hear a Statment about that. Greetings
Capt Nathan Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 Its part of the in game diplomatic affairs if they all agreed to hand over ownership of a port as part of a treaty and most of the nation agrees then i see it as in game role-play and not abuse. if it was two solo clans basically attacking the same port every night to boost xp and gold then yes i would say your right but as it stands i think nothing wrong with it. just my opinion
admin Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 If players decide that we need alliances in game in the future this will not be needed as allied nations will be able to use ports of their allies or vassals. Right now it is not an exploit - nations can trade ports with each other if they see fit. 5
Aussie Pastor Posted March 2, 2016 Posted March 2, 2016 If players decide that we need alliances in game in the future this will not be needed as allied nations will be able to use ports of their allies or vassals. Right now it is not an exploit - nations can trade ports with each other if they see fit. He mate, you feeling better? You are looking at the forums. Don't rush your recovery as that leads to a severe relapse. The game is good, but it looks like my ATI 7970 has died. trying to see about a work around till end of next week......pay week!!!!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now